[STT50-09] Detection of huge deformation by SAR interferometry with split-spectrum method
Keywords:InSAR, split-spectrum method, crustal deformation
Generally, phase difference obtained by SAR interferometry Φtotal(f) is discribed as
Φtotal(f) = 4π Δρnon-disp f/c + 4π K ΔTEC/cf + cnst
where Δρnon-disp is non-dispersive slant-range change (e.g., crustal deformation, orbital contribution, atmospheric delay), ΔTEC is valiation of the total electron content along the radar propagation path. The first and the second terms on the right hand side are called the non-dispersive and the dispersive components, respectively. f is radar frequency, c is speed of light, and K, cnst are constants. Dispersive and non-dispersive components can be divided by the split-spectrum method. Its method makes two SLC pairs with high and low frequency applying the band pass filter and divides their components based on the difference in response to the frequency difference in two interferograms made from them (e.g., Rosen et al, 2010; Gomba et al.,2016; Wegmüller et al., 2018). Double difference of two frequency intrefergrams after removing dispersive component is described as
Φdiff = 4π Δρnon-disp (fhigh - flow)/c + cnst.
It corresponds to interferometric phase obtained by radar frequency of fhigh - flow. For example, in a case that SM1 mode data of PALSAR-2 (80MHz bandwidth) is used, fhigh - flow is 40 MHz (the wavelength is 7.5m). In most cases, this interferometric phase is small value within -π and +π radians, even if a large crustal deformation occurs. Therefore, the phase unwrapping is not necessary.
Applying this method to interferometric pair for the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake (PALSAR-2, SM1), phase difference exceeding π radian was obtained due to huge crustal deformation. Then, we created three sub-band SAR images from original SAR images, and estimate phase difference between high and low sub-band interferograms, connecting phase differences for high-mid-low sub-band phases.
Comparing slant-range changes obtained from this method and offset-tracking method, they are almost consistent. While the offset-tracking method using a correlation window deteriorates the resolution, this method can obtain the slant range change with the same spatial resolution as the normal SAR interferometry. In this method, noise due to decorrelation is amplified, so its application is limited to data pairs with high coherence. However, if the application condition is good, there is a possibility that the crustal deformation distribution can be obtained with high accuracy even when large crustal deformation has occurred.