日本地球惑星科学連合2022年大会

講演情報

[J] ポスター発表

セッション記号 H (地球人間圏科学) » H-SC 社会地球科学・社会都市システム

[H-SC06] 地球温暖化防⽌と地学(CO2地中貯留・有効利⽤、地球⼯学)

2022年6月1日(水) 11:00 〜 13:00 オンラインポスターZoom会場 (15) (Ch.15)

コンビーナ:徂徠 正夫(国立研究開発法人産業技術総合研究所地圏資源環境研究部門)、コンビーナ:薛 自求(公益財団法人 地球環境産業技術研究機構)、愛知 正温(東京大学大学院新領域創成科学研究科)、コンビーナ:今野 義浩(The University of Tokyo, Japan)、座長:薛 自求(公益財団法人 地球環境産業技術研究機構)、今野 義浩(The University of Tokyo, Japan)、愛知 正温(東京大学大学院新領域創成科学研究科)、徂徠 正夫(国立研究開発法人産業技術総合研究所地圏資源環境研究部門)

11:00 〜 13:00

[HSC06-P01] CO2貯留のサイト選定ステージにおける不確実性下の意思決定解析

*中島 崇裕1,2、合田 隆3薛 自求1,2 (1.(公財)地球環境産業技術研究機構、2.二酸化炭素地中貯留技術研究組合、3.東京大学 工学部)

キーワード:CO2地中貯留、不確実性下の意思決定、情報の価値、期待金額

For the implementation of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS), there are large uncertainties, such as amount of storable CO2 and injectivity, in the storage part compared to the capture and the transport parts. If expected amount of CO2 cannot be stored at a site, the development cost including surface facilities would be wasted. On the other hand, in the field of decision analysis, various methods have been proposed to assist optimal decision-making under uncertainties. We applied one of these methods to the decision-making at the early stage of geological storage of a site.

We introduced a simple decision-making model at a candidate site. The nature of state was settled as two states; “Possible” and “Impossible” to store CO2. There assumed to be an inexpensive measurement method to obtain information on whether the storage is “Possible” or “Impossible” with some errors defined by probability. The action must be chosen from “Go”, “Re-exam”, and “Discard”. We also assumed the precision of the measurement method and payoff of every state. We evaluated Expected Monetary Value (EMV) of all possible decision methods in this model. From the decision analysis, we could obtain the optimal action as the function of the probability of “Possible” state. At extreme cases where the probability of “Possible” state is very high/low, the optimal action were “Go”/”Discard”. Furthermore, we examined the optimal action at the continuous probability of “Possible” state. The value of information by the measurement method was also calculated. This represents that the simple measurements method is needed to probe the site. We will discuss the effect of the precision of the measurement method and the payoff of each state following the cost estimation for CCS. This kind of analysis provide quantitative insight into the optimal decision-making at the early stage of geological storage.