9:30 AM - 9:45 AM
[PCG19-03] Variations in vertical CO/CO2 profiles in the Martian mesosphere and lower thermosphere measured by ExoMars TGO/NOMAD: Implications of variations in eddy diffusion coefficient
Keywords:Mars, Eddy diffusion coefficient, Trace Gas Orbiter, Trace Gas, 1D-photochemical model
We applied the equivalent width technique [Chamberlain and Hunten, 1987; Krasnopolsky, 1986] to derive CO and CO2column densities. In the case that the optical depth of the absorption line is not saturated, the slant column density is given by W = SN, where W is the area of absorption, S is the line intensity, and N is the slant column density in the line of sight. We derived the slant column density using 4288.2 and 4291.5 cm-1 for CO and 3355.7, 3357.2, 3358.7, and 3360.3 cm-1 for CO2. The CO/CO2 ratio is derived between 75 and ~105 km altitudes. We use only the orbits which measure CO spectra (in order 190, 4269.95 – 4303.99 cm-1) and CO2 spectra (in order 149, 3348.54 – 3375.23 cm-1) simultaneously in MY 35, corresponding from 25th March 2019 to 6th February 2021. The total number of orbits used in this study is 649.
We found that the retrieved CO/CO2 ratio between 75 and ~105 km shows a significant seasonal variation in the southern hemisphere, which decreases near perihelion and increases near aphelion between ~1500 and ~5000 ppm at 85 km. The slope of CO/CO2profiles becomes steep near perihelion in the southern hemisphere. To investigate the contribution of the variability of the eddy diffusion coefficient in each hemisphere and season, we calculated the CO/CO2 by a 1D photochemical model [Koyama et al. 2021] with two cases: (1) the eddy diffusion coefficients are uniform in vertical; (2) the vertical profile of eddy diffusion coefficient is given by K = An-1/2, where A is constant, and n is total number density [cf. Lindzen, 1971]. Our estimation shows that the altitude-dependent eddy diffusion coefficient is better than the vertically-uniform eddy diffusion coefficients to reproduce the observed profiles. In addition, our observation firstly suggested the variation of the eddy diffusion coefficient. In the southern hemisphere, K = 4.25×1013n-1/2 for Ls = 90 – 120 and K = 1.5×1014n-1/2 for Ls = 240 – 270. Throughout the altitude range, the eddy diffusion coefficient in Ls = 240 – 270 is larger by a factor of ~2 than that in Ls = 90 – 120 in the southern hemisphere. On the other hand, the estimated eddy diffusion coefficient in the northern hemisphere is comparable between both Ls ranges; K = 7×1013n-1/2 for Ls = 90 – 120 and K = 1.25×1014n-1/2 for Ls = 240 – 270. That would suggest the efficiency of the vertical diffusion varies with season and latitude.