日本地球惑星科学連合2022年大会

講演情報

[J] 口頭発表

セッション記号 P (宇宙惑星科学) » P-CG 宇宙惑星科学複合領域・一般

[P-CG19] 惑星大気圏・電磁圏

2022年5月27日(金) 09:00 〜 10:30 303 (幕張メッセ国際会議場)

コンビーナ:前澤 裕之(大阪府立大学大学院理学系研究科物理科学科)、コンビーナ:寺田 直樹(東北大学大学院理学研究科)、関 華奈子(東京大学大学院理学系研究科)、コンビーナ:今村 剛(東京大学大学院 新領域創成科学研究科)、座長:原田 裕己(京都大学理学研究科)、前澤 裕之(大阪府立大学大学院理学系研究科物理科学科)

09:30 〜 09:45

[PCG19-03] Variations in vertical CO/CO2 profiles in the Martian mesosphere and lower thermosphere measured by ExoMars TGO/NOMAD: Implications of variations in eddy diffusion coefficient

*吉田 奈央1中川 広務1青木 翔平2,3、Erwin Justin3、Vandaele Ann Carine3、Daerden Frank3、Thomas Ian3、Trompet Loïc3小山 俊吾1寺田 直樹1、Neary Lori3村田 功1、Villanueva Geronimo4、Liuzzi Giuliano4,5、Lopez-Valverde Miguel Angel6、Brines Adian6、Modak Ashim6笠羽 康正1、Ristic Bojan3、Patel Manish7、Bellucci Giancarlo8、López-Moreno José Juan6 (1.東北大学大学院 理学研究科 地球物理学専攻、2.宇宙航空研究開発機構 宇宙科学研究所、3.Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (BIRA-IASB)、4.NASA Goddard Space Flight Center、5.Department of Physics, American University、6.Instituto de Astrofisica de Andalucia (IAA/CSIC)、7.School of Physical Sciences, The Open University、8.Institute di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali (IAPS/INAF))


キーワード:火星、渦拡散係数、Trace Gas Orbiter、微量大気、一次元光化学モデル

CO is produced by the photodissociation of CO2 and recycled to CO2 by the catalytic cycle involving HOx in the Martian atmosphere [e.g., McElroy & Donahue, 1972]. The photochemical lifetime of CO is ~6 years in the lower atmosphere [Krasnopolsky, 2007]. While, in the middle and upper atmosphere (> ~50 km), the photochemical lifetime of CO becomes even much longer due to the decrease in the HOx species density and longer than the characteristic times of production and eddy diffusion. It suggests that CO profiles are determined by the production and eddy diffusion at those regions. The eddy diffusion coefficient is used for parameterizing the efficiency of vertical diffusion, however, estimated values have a large scatter between 40 and 90 km altitude [Rodrigo et al., 1990]. Recently, a substantial variation in the eddy diffusion coefficient at the homopause altitude has been suggested [Slipski et al., 2018]. It implies that CO profiles in the middle and upper atmosphere vary with variations in the eddy diffusion coefficient. ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter (TGO) can measure the vertical profiles of CO in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere. Olsen et al. (2021) reported the vertical distribution of CO and its variation during a dust storm, however, the effects of change in the eddy diffusion coefficient on the profile of CO mixing ratio have not been investigated. In this study, we use Nadir and Occultation for MArs Discovery (NOMAD) aboard TGO to retrieve the vertical CO/CO2 profile and to investigate the variability of the eddy diffusion coefficient.
We applied the equivalent width technique [Chamberlain and Hunten, 1987; Krasnopolsky, 1986] to derive CO and CO2column densities. In the case that the optical depth of the absorption line is not saturated, the slant column density is given by W = SN, where W is the area of absorption, S is the line intensity, and N is the slant column density in the line of sight. We derived the slant column density using 4288.2 and 4291.5 cm-1 for CO and 3355.7, 3357.2, 3358.7, and 3360.3 cm-1 for CO2. The CO/CO2 ratio is derived between 75 and ~105 km altitudes. We use only the orbits which measure CO spectra (in order 190, 4269.95 – 4303.99 cm-1) and CO2 spectra (in order 149, 3348.54 – 3375.23 cm-1) simultaneously in MY 35, corresponding from 25th March 2019 to 6th February 2021. The total number of orbits used in this study is 649.
We found that the retrieved CO/CO2 ratio between 75 and ~105 km shows a significant seasonal variation in the southern hemisphere, which decreases near perihelion and increases near aphelion between ~1500 and ~5000 ppm at 85 km. The slope of CO/CO2profiles becomes steep near perihelion in the southern hemisphere. To investigate the contribution of the variability of the eddy diffusion coefficient in each hemisphere and season, we calculated the CO/CO2 by a 1D photochemical model [Koyama et al. 2021] with two cases: (1) the eddy diffusion coefficients are uniform in vertical; (2) the vertical profile of eddy diffusion coefficient is given by K = An-1/2, where A is constant, and n is total number density [cf. Lindzen, 1971]. Our estimation shows that the altitude-dependent eddy diffusion coefficient is better than the vertically-uniform eddy diffusion coefficients to reproduce the observed profiles. In addition, our observation firstly suggested the variation of the eddy diffusion coefficient. In the southern hemisphere, K = 4.25×1013n-1/2 for Ls = 90 – 120 and K = 1.5×1014n-1/2 for Ls = 240 – 270. Throughout the altitude range, the eddy diffusion coefficient in Ls = 240 – 270 is larger by a factor of ~2 than that in Ls = 90 – 120 in the southern hemisphere. On the other hand, the estimated eddy diffusion coefficient in the northern hemisphere is comparable between both Ls ranges; K = 7×1013n-1/2 for Ls = 90 – 120 and K = 1.25×1014n-1/2 for Ls = 240 – 270. That would suggest the efficiency of the vertical diffusion varies with season and latitude.