日本地球惑星科学連合2022年大会

講演情報

[E] ポスター発表

セッション記号 P (宇宙惑星科学) » P-PS 惑星科学

[P-PS03] 太陽系小天体:太陽系進化における最新成果と今後の展望

2022年6月2日(木) 11:00 〜 13:00 オンラインポスターZoom会場 (4) (Ch.04)

コンビーナ:岡田 達明(宇宙航空研究開発機構宇宙科学研究所)、コンビーナ:黒田 大介(京都大学)、樋口 有理可(産業医科大学)、座長:黒田 大介(京都大学)、樋口 有理可(産業医科大学)、岡田 達明(宇宙航空研究開発機構宇宙科学研究所)

11:00 〜 13:00

[PPS03-P14] リュウグウ粉末試料のX線回折による研究:炭素質コンドライトとの比較

*今栄 直也1山口 亮1木村 眞1富岡 尚敬2伊藤 元雄2上椙 真之3白井 直樹4、大東 琢治5、Liu Ming-Chang6、Greenwood Richard7、上杉 健太郎3中藤 亜衣子8、与賀田 佳澄8、湯沢 勇人5、兒玉 優9、安武 正展3、平原 香織10、竹内 晃久3、桜井 郁也11、岡田 育夫11、唐牛 譲8矢田 達8安部 正真8 (1.情報・システム研究機構 国立極地研究所、2.海洋研究開発機構 高知コア研究所、3.公益財団法人 高輝度光科学研究センター、4.東京都立大学、5.分子科学研究所、6.UCLA、7.Open University、8.JAXA-ISAS、9.MWJ、10.大阪大学、11.名古屋大学)

キーワード:リュウグウ、X線回折、ピロータイト

Introduction
On December 6, 2020, the Hayabusa2 sample mission returned in total ~5.4 g of samples from asteroid Ryugu to Earth without exposure to terrestrial contaminations [1-3]. After the initial examinations of Ryugu particles at the JAXA curation facility, some samples of chambers A and C were allocated to the Phase2 Kochi curation team for advanced characterization [2]. The chambers A and C particles were acquired from the surface at the time of initial touchdown and from subsurface after the crater formation experiment at the second touchdown by Hayabusa2, respectively [1,4]. We have evaluated bulk mineralogical characterizations of the limited amount samples using a non-destructive, laboratory-based X-ray diffractometry technique (XRD) [5], and the technique was applied to the Ryugu analyses in the present study. The XRD data were compared with those of available Antarctic meteorites and non-Antarctic meteorites to clarify the differences and similarities among the samples.

Experiments
The SmartLab (RIGAKU) X-ray diffractometer at NIPR was used under the condition of CuKa at 40 kV and 40 mA, length limiting slit 10 mm, divergence angle (1/6)º, 1-dimensional strip detector (D/tex Ultra 250), double Bragg angle (2theta) 3–100º, 28 hrs on measurement time, and the Bragg and Brentano optics. A0029 and A0037 being mixed each other, the powdered Ryugu of A0029 (<1mg) and A0037 (<<1mg), and C0087 (<1mg) samples were prepared in a clean bench, pressed using a sapphire glass plate on a silicon non-reflection plate. The diffraction data of powdered minerals provided by International Centre for Diffraction Data were used as references for diffraction peak assignments: saponite (00-013-0086), antigorite (00-002-0098), magnetite (00-019-0629), dolomite (01-071-1662), pyrrhotite 4C (01-074-7398), and pyrrhotite 3C (01-071-0591) as well as inhouse data from natural and synthetic minerals available at the laboratory.

Results and discussion
The diffraction data of the particles A and C show that both of the grains mainly consist of phyllosilicates (mostly matched with saponite), magnetite, dolomite, and pyrrhotite. The dolomite peaks from chamber A are more intense than those from C. The higher abundance of dolomite in chamber A than C is consistent with petrological observations (e.g., [6]).
The diffraction patterns of Ryugu particles are also entirely different from those of known CY and CM Antarctic carbonaceous chondrites which experienced extensive hydrous alteration, but overall agree with those of the CI chondrite Orgueil. The only exception is gypsum, which is common in Orgueil [7,8] but absent in Ryugu. The feature is also for ferrihydrite [9]. One explanation is that these two phases may be terrestrial alteration products. In addition, the pyrrhotite peaks of Ryugu are more intense than those of Orgueil (e.g., [10]). The pyrrhotite grains in Ryugu were identified mostly as the superstructure 4C based on single-crystal electron diffraction patterns [9], however, the broad single peak at d=2.06Å in the bulk XRD patterns may include the 3C pyrrhotite [11]. Since the 3C pyrrhotite is a metastable phase synthesized as a quench product from ~500ºC [12], the coexistence of the phase may imply the unique origin such as shock effect.

References
[1] Yada et al. 2021. Nature Astronomy. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-021-01550-6. [2] Ito et al. 2022. 53rd LPSC #1601. [3] Ito et al. Nature Astronomy (in submission). [4] Morota et al. 2020. Science 368:654. [5] Imae et al. 2021. The 12th Polar Science Symp. [6] Yamaguchi et al. 2022. 53rd LPSC #1822. [7] Tomeoka and Buseck 1988. GCA 52:1627. [8] Gounelle and Zolensky 2001. M&PS 36:1321. [9] Tomioka et al. 2022. 53rd LPSC. #1710. [10] King et al. 2015. GCA 165:148. [11] Nakano et al. 1979. Acta Cryst. B35:722. [12] Fleet 1971. Acta Cryst. B27:1864.