Japan Geoscience Union Meeting 2022

Presentation information

[E] Oral

S (Solid Earth Sciences ) » S-VC Volcanology

[S-VC28] International volcanology

Tue. May 24, 2022 10:45 AM - 12:15 PM International Conference Room (IC) (International Conference Hall, Makuhari Messe)

convener:Chris Conway(Geological Survey of Japan, AIST), convener:Keiko Matsumoto(Geological Survey of Japan, The National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology), Taishi Yamada(Sakurajima Volcano Research Center, Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University), convener:Katy Jane Chamberlain(University of Derby), Chairperson:Chris Conway(Geological Survey of Japan, AIST), Keiko Matsumoto(Geological Survey of Japan, The National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology), Taishi Yamada(Sakurajima Volcano Research Center, Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University)


10:45 AM - 11:00 AM

[SVC28-07] Toward the rapid quantification of the pumice rafts volume - An attempt from Fukutoku-Oka-no-Ba 2021 Eruption and other recent raft-forming eruptions.

★Invited Papers

*Fumihiko Ikegami1,2 (1.University of Tasmania, 2.Ikegami Georesearch)

Keywords:Fukutoku-Oka-no-Ba, pumice rafts, submarine volcano

The 2021 eruption of Fukutoku-Oka-no-Ba demonstrated that the pumice rafts from underwater volcanic eruptions can be a major hazard to ship traffic, aquacultures, industrial plants, and harbour infrastructures. Despite satellites having detected the rafts 2 months earlier, nobody was prepared for the stranding of the pumice rafts. It was because we currently do not have a method to evaluate the level of threat from the pumice rafts. A major challenge especially lies in the estimation of their volume, which has never been determined reliably.

I analysed the geometries of the pumice rafts from Fukutoku-Oka-no-Ba (2021) and compared to the past raft-forming eruptions such as Havre (2012) and Volcano F (2019). The total sizes of the rafts continuously expanded over time in all eruptions, indicating the ubiquitous role of thickness for their spreading. The morphological change of some rafts over time shows the transition from a coherent raft to a raft with a lagoon inside that also supports the spreading process in the rafts. The spreading is believed to be driven by the buoyancy of pumices stacked in the water column, hence the spreading rate would be faster as the raft was thicker. The actual spreading rates of the rafts significantly vary between the eruptions and are consistent to the model. Further observations in the relationship between the raft thickness and their spreading rate enable us to calculate the volume of the pumice rafts in a few days after the eruption.