*Kaoru Kawakami1, Yoshinori Iizuka1, Mahiro Sasage1,2, Mai Matsumoto1,2, Takeshi Saito1, Akira Hori3, Sakiko Ishino4, Shuji Fujita5,6, Koji Fujita7, Keita Takasugi3, Takumi Hatakeyama8, Saaya Hamamoto7, Akihisa Watari, Nao Esashi7, Miu Otsuka, Ryu Uemura7, Kazuho Horiuchi8, Masahiro Minowa1, Shohei Hattori9, Teruo Aoki5,6, Motohiro Hirabayashi5, Kenji Kawamura5,6,10, Sumito Matoba1
(1.Institute of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido University,, 2.Graduate School of Environmental Science, Hokkaido University, 3.Kitami Institute of Technology, 4.Institute of Nature and Environmental Technology, Kanazawa University, 5.National Institute of Polar Research, 6.Department of Polar Science, The Graduate University of Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI, 7.Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Nagoya University, 8.Graduate School of Science and Technology, Hirosaki University, 9.International Center for Isotope Effects Research, School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing University, 10.Japan Agency for Marine Science and Technology)
Keywords:Greenland, Ice core, Paleoclimate, SE-Dome Ⅱ ice core
Arctic warming has accelerated surface melting even in the highland areas of the Greenland ice sheet. Understanding the relationship between climate and surface melting is essential for improving the estimates of ice-sheet mass loss due to warming. We here analyzed an ice core (hereafter SE-Dome Ⅱ ice core) from the southeastern dome of Greenland, where the accumulation rate is high [1] and bears a large discrepancy among the climate models regarding snow accumulation estimates [2]. From stratigraphical observations, dielectric profile, H2O2, and tritium concentrations, we established the half-year accurate time scale for 1799–2020 and then compared ice core results with the ERA5 reanalysis data (1950–2020). The annual ice layer thickness has increased over 220 years and has synchronized with temperature changes in the Arctic. In contrast, the annual accumulation rate from the SE-Dome Ⅱ ice core with an average of 1.04 ± 0.20 m w.e. yr−1 shows no significant trend in the 220 years. A significant positive correlation is found between the annual ice layer thickness and time-integrated summer temperature anomaly of the ERA5 air temperature. The annual accumulation rate estimated from the SE-Dome Ⅱ ice core is consistent with the ERA5 precipitation rate. Our results suggest that the annual accumulation rate in the southeastern dome is constant regardless of temperature warming and the SE-Dome Ⅱ ice core has an advantage for reconstructing the past environment from the pre-industrial to the present with the half-year accurate time scale.
[1] Iizuka et al., 2021: Bull. Glaciol. Res.,39, 1–12. [2] Fettweis et al., 2020: The Cryosphere, 14, 3935–3958.