*Kazuho Horiuchi1, Kento Sato2, Riko Yagihashi1, Kimikazu Sasa3, Masumi Matsumura3, Tsutomu Takahashi3, Hideaki Motoyama4
(1.Graduate School of Science and Technology, Hirosaki University, 2.Faculty of Science and Technology, Hirosaki University, 3.Accelerator Mass Spectrometry Group, Tandem Accelerator Complex, University of Tsukuba, 4.National Institute of Polar Research)
Keywords:Chlorine-36, Nuclear Bomb Testing, Southern Hemisphere, Antarctica, Anthropocene, Accelerator Mass Spectrometry
Chlorine-36 (36Cl) is a radioisotope of chlorine with a half-life of 301 kyr. Prior to the Atomic Era, 36Cl in the environment was largely produced by spallation reactions between cosmic ray particles and target atoms (i.e. cosmogenic production). However, with the advent of atomic bomb testing, anthropogenic 36Cl began to be produced by thermal neutron activation of the 35Cl of sea salts. In particular, extensive marine testing in the 1950s and '60s is thought to have produced a large bomb peak of 36Cl reported from a dozen ice cores worldwide (Elmore et al., 1982; Heikkilä et al., 2009; Pivot et al., 2019). In this presentation, we present an ice core record of 36Cl covering the period 1950 to 1970 CE from the H15 site (69°04'10"S, 40°44'51"E) in Dronning Maud Land, East Antarctica. The 36Cl was analyzed at the University of Tsukuba Tandem Accelerator Complex (UTTAC) using a common procedure for ice core 36Cl analysis (e.g., Sasa et al., 2010; Kanzawa et al., 2021). The 36Cl concentrations ranged from 1.1 × 104 to 2.6 × 105 atoms/g. It increased dramatically in the middle '50s to the most pronounced peak in the late '50s. After that, the concentration decreased rather gradually until the end of the record (1970 CE), with small peaks in the middle and the late '60s. These 36Cl variations appear to be consistent with the history of explosive yields from marine nuclear bomb tests. In addition to the major features described above, there are some minor variations to be found in our record at the seasonal level of resolution. This suggests that both the insignificance of post-depositional 36Cl mobility and some seasonality of 36Cl deposition at the H15 site.