日本地球惑星科学連合2023年大会

講演情報

[E] 口頭発表

セッション記号 A (大気水圏科学) » A-CG 大気海洋・環境科学複合領域・一般

[A-CG37] 衛星による地球環境観測

2023年5月26日(金) 10:45 〜 12:15 104 (幕張メッセ国際会議場)

コンビーナ:沖 理子(宇宙航空研究開発機構)、本多 嘉明(千葉大学環境リモートセンシング研究センター)、高薮 縁(東京大学 大気海洋研究所)、松永 恒雄(国立環境研究所地球環境研究センター/衛星観測センター)、座長:岡本 幸三(気象研究所)

11:00 〜 11:15

[ACG37-08] Comparison between SGLI/GCOM-C and MODIS/Terra observed Level 2.0 cloud properties

*Khatri Pradeep1、Hayasaka Tadahiro1 (1.東北大学大気海洋変動観測研究センター)

キーワード:MODIS、SGLI、Optical thickness、Effective radius、water clouds、ice clouds

We compared Level 2.0 water and ice cloud properties between Second-generation Global Imager (SGLI) aboard GCOM-C satellite and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) aboard Terra satellite for both land and ocean surfaces. The cloud pixels identified as water phase by both satellite sensors are highly consistent to each other by more than 90%, although the consistency is only ~60% for ice phase cloud pixels. Comparison of cloud properties—cloud optical thickness (COT) and cloud particle effective radius (CER)—between these two satellite sensors reveals that water and ice cloud properties can have different degree of agreement depending on underlying surface. The relative difference (RD) values of 22%(18%) and 37% (24%) for water cloud COT(CER) comparison over ocean and land surfaces and respective values of 35%(42%) and 35% (62%) for comparisons of ice cloud properties, and also other comparison metrics, suggest better agreements for water cloud properties than for ice cloud properties and for ocean surface than for land surface. Though cloud properties differences between MODIS and SGLI can arise from inherent features of cloud retrieval algorithms, such as differences in ancillary data, surface reflectance, cloud droplet size distribution function, model for ice particle habit etc., this study further identifies important roles of cloud thickness and Sun and satellite positions for differences in cloud properties between SGLI and MODIS: the differences in cloud properties are found to increase for thinner clouds, higher solar zenith angle, and higher differences in viewing zenith and azimuth angles between these satellite sensors, and such differences are more distinct for water cloud properties than for ice cloud properties.