日本地球惑星科学連合2023年大会

講演情報

[J] オンラインポスター発表

セッション記号 A (大気水圏科学) » A-CG 大気海洋・環境科学複合領域・一般

[A-CG39] 陸域生態系の物質循環

2023年5月26日(金) 10:45 〜 12:15 オンラインポスターZoom会場 (7) (オンラインポスター)

コンビーナ:加藤 知道(北海道大学農学研究院)、寺本 宗正(鳥取大学乾燥地研究センター)、伊勢 武史(京都大学フィールド科学教育研究センター)、市井 和仁(千葉大学)


現地ポスター発表開催日時 (2023/5/25 17:15-18:45)

10:45 〜 12:15

[ACG39-P01] Response of CO2 fluxes to precipitation event in a grassland ecosystem in central Mongolia

*Munemasa Teramoto1、Toshihiko Kinugasa1、Naishen Liang2、Gantsetseg Batdelger3、Takehiro Sasaki4、Yu Yoshihara5、Richa Hu1 (1.Tottori University、2.National Institute for Environmental Studies、3.Information and Research Institute of Meteorology, Hydrology, and Environment、4.Yokohama National University、5.Mie University)

キーワード:Chamber, Dryland, Climate change, Respiration, Photosynthesis, Carbon cycle

Precipitation events remarkably influence the dynamics of CO2 fluxes like net ecosystem CO2 exchange (NEE), ecosystems respiration (Re), and gross primary production (GPP), especially in water-limited semi-arid and arid regions. But the magnitude of the response varies in each ecosystem and the study. Understanding the mechanism and the magnitude of the response of CO2 fluxes to precipitation events is becoming more and more important because of the changing precipitation pattern due to global climate change.

This study was conducted in a grassland ecosystem in Bayan-Unjuul in Mongolia in early August 2022. In the study site, we set 6 rectangle frames (inner size: 29.6 cm × 45.6 cm) made of aluminum flames and aluminum plates for CO2 flux measurement. After one night from the setup, we measured NEE with no shading and Re under complete shading in the daytime. GPP was calculated as Re minus NEE. For CO2 flux measurement, we used a portable automated chamber measurement system consisting of a transparent cuboid chamber and a control box that includes a datalogger (CR1000, Campbell Scientific Inc., Logan, UT, USA) and a CO2 analyzer (LI-830, LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA). The measurement was conducted before (Aug 5) and after (Aug 6) the precipitation event.

Both GPP and Re significantly increased (about 3.2 times for GPP and 4.0 times for Re) after the precipitation event (precipitation size = 7.6 mm d-1) compared with each flux value before the precipitation (p < 0.01), but there was no significant change in NEE (p > 0.05). This point suggests that the productivity of the herbivorous vegetation in the study site was remarkably promoted by the precipitation event, but the promotion was concealed by the activated respiratory components like soil organic carbon decomposition by microbes and plant respiration after the precipitation event. To better understand the response of CO2 fluxes to precipitation in this site, we will further need to examine CO2 flux responses in the case of different precipitation sizes.