1:45 PM - 3:15 PM
[HRE11-P10] Promotion of hydrogen generation during low temperature serpentinization
Keywords:Serpentinization, Harzburgite, Flow-through experiment, Hydrogen, M-S-H, Geochemical modeling
Results of the batch experiments show that fresh harzburgite samples from Soroako yielded the highest amounts of hydrogen, up to 322.1 μmol/kg of rock sample, whereas serpentinized samples tend to generate lower amounts of hydrogen. This suggests that hydrogen was primarily generated by dissolution of olivine and pyroxene. Chemical compositions of the recovered solution indicate that samples with a low degree of serpentinization results in lower pH (8.1 – 9.0 at 25ºC) as well as higher dissolved Si and Ca concentrations. Microscopic observation and analysis of the recovered solid samples indicate that low crystalline Mg-bearing silicates precipitated in the batch experiments when a fresh harzburgite was used as the starting material. The Mg-bearing silicates likely buffered the solution at a lower pH than that buffered by brucite (Mg(OH)2), which is typically expected to precipitate when dunite or serpentinite is dissolved. Therefore, we propose that precipitation of the Mg-bearing silicates is caused by dissolution of pyroxene in harzburgite, which is more Si-rich than olivine. Another series of batch experiments, in which chemical reagents (fumed silica, Ca(OH)2 and MgO) were added to a fresh harzburgite demonstrate that addition of Si enhanced hydrogen generation. Results of the flow through experiments show that it generated ~8 times higher amount of hydrogen than the batch experiments under similar experimental conditions (i.e., temperature, duration, stating materials). This is likely caused by water flow, which kept the pH at 7.9, lower than the batch experiments. This also suggests the importance of primary mineral dissolution for hydrogen generation. However, the generated amount of hydrogen was still much lower than that predicted from reactive transport modeling constructed for low temperature serpentinization. The difference appears to be stemmed from poor recovery of hydrogen in the flow-through experimental system as well as uncertainty of Fe precipitates in the modeling. Although the model considers only magnetite as the potential Fe-bearing product, Fe may have been also incorporated into silicate phases.