10:45 AM - 12:15 PM
[SIT18-P01] Sulfur partitioning between light element-bearing liquid iron and molten silicate
Keywords:sulfur, core-mantle interaction, first-principles calculation
In this study, we perform ab initio free energy simulations based on the thermodynamic integration method [6-8] to predict the partitioning behavior between liquid iron and molten silicate at high pressure and temperature (20~135 GPa, 4000~5000 K). The liquid states are reproduced by the constant-temperature ab initio molecular dynamics method based on the density functional theory [9,10]. We determine reaction free energies and partitioning coefficients for the equilibrium partitioning reactions of S [3,5], FeOsilicate + 1/2S2 ↔ FeSmetal + 1/2O2, which are often assumed in experimental studies.
The obtained partitioning coefficients of S range from logDS=1.5~3.5 at 20~135 GPa and 4000~5000 K. Being consistent with the previous experiments, the pressure dependence is found to be positive, while the temperature dependence is negative. DS is found to decrease with increasing the O content in the Fe liquid, while it does not change significantly with increasing the Fe content in the molten silicate. Compared to the previous studies, the siderophility of S is comparable or higher than that reported by the MA&PC experiments. However, the pressure dependence is relatively smaller, which is more similar to the DAC results. The temperature dependence is on the other hand intermediate between MA&PC and DAC. The decrease in the siderophility of S due to the incorporation of O in liquid iron might partially explain the discrepancy between the results of MA&PC and DAC. Other light elements such as Si, H, and C might also influence the S partitioning. The effects of other light elements are now being calculated to model the chemical evolutions of the mantle and core.
[1] F. Birch: J. Geophys. Res., 57, 227 (1952).
[2] J.P. Lorand, L. Ambre, and A. Olivier: Lithos 164, 2 (2013).
[3] T.A. Suer, et al.: Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 469, 84 (2017).
[4] J. Li, and C.B. Agee: Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 81 (2001).
[5] L. Rose-Weston, et al.: Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 73, 4598 (2009).
[6] T. Taniuchi and T. Tsuchiya: J. Phys.: Cond. Matt., 30, 114003 (2018).
[7] Z. Xiong, T. Tsuchiya, and T. Taniuchi: J. Geophys. Res., 123, 6451 (2018).
[8] Z. Xiong, T. Tsuchiya, and J.A. Van Orman: Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2020GL090769 (2021).
[9] P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn: Phys. Rev., 136, B864 (1964).
[10] W. Kohn and L.J. Sham: Phys. Rev., 140, A1133 (1965).