10:45 AM - 12:15 PM
[STT43-P03] Accuracy Evaluation for Finite Element Calculation of Long-period Ground Motions in the Sagami Trough Megathrust Earthquake
Keywords:long-period ground motion, Finite element method, Finite difference method
In the target E-wave FEM calculation setup, a source fault model consisting of four asperities is placed in a calculation domain of 182 km in the east-west direction, 168 km in the north-south direction, and 140 km in the vertical direction, which includes the Kanto Plain. This setup models the Sagami Trough megathrust earthquake. The seismic wave velocity structure is set as a three-dimensional heterogeneous velocity structure consisting of 41 layers, each of which has uniform seismic wave velocity, based on the J-SHIS database of the National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention. The finite element mesh composed of unstructured tetrahedral elements were generated for this domain to meet the requirement of at least five elements per wavelength. Seismic ground motions were calculated for a frequency band up to 0.5 Hz with a time step length of 0.02 second x 15000 steps for a period of 300 seconds. In order to evaluate the setup of the mesh size in this calculation, we newly generated a finer unstructured mesh, which meets the requirement of at least of 10 elements per wavelength. Using this finer mesh and keeping other conditions the same, we performed long-period seismic motion calculations for comparison. The computation time was about 7 hours using 1024 computation nodes of "Fugaku".
We compared the pseudo-velocity response spectra of the above two calculations of difference mesh sizes for multiple evaluation points in the target area. The differences were generally low at the level of a few percent, suggesting that the mesh size of the original setup was small enough. In the presentation at the conference, we will also show the cross sections of subsurface velocity structure between the evaluation points and source fault models. We then discuss the relationship the cross sections with the comparison results.
Acknowledgments: This work was supported by MEXT as “Program for Promoting Researches on the Supercomputer Fugaku” (Large-scale numerical simulation of earthquake generation, wave propagation and soil amplification, Project ID: hp200126, hp210171, hp220171) and used computational resources of the Earth Simulator provided by the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology. This work used the E-wave FEM code which was originally provided by the Earthquake Research Institute, The University of Tokyo and modified by JAMSTEC.