3:30 PM - 5:00 PM
[SVC35-P12] Differences among three major pyroclastic flow deposits (Handa, Shimosakata, and Miyagi) at the southern foot of Kuju Volcano and stratigraphy of "Shimosakata pyroclastic flow deposit"
Keywords:Active Volcano, Volcanic geology, Eruption history
[Results] The Miyagi pfd contains reddish-brown oxidized volcanic rock fragments container than anoxidized volcanic rock fragments. But, Shimosakata and Handa pfds don't contain so many oxidized rock fragments. At the Fukuhara area at the northern part of the Kamisakata-Shimosakata area, pfd of Kuju volcanic origin (Kuju X pfd) are founded above the Aso-4 unconsolidated pfd. The distribution locality is close to the "Shimosakata pfd" in the Kamisakata-Shimosakata area, and the elevation is almost the same, and the grain size analysis and particle composition results are similar. The pfd below the Aso-4 unconsolidated pfd was founded in this study at the Imamura area that is Ono et al. (1977) reported the Shimosakata pfd between Aso-4/3.
[Discussion] The Miyagi pfd is distinguished from the Shimosakata and Handa pfds by the presence of many oxidized rock fragments. "Shimosakata pfd" in the Kamisakata-Shimosakata area and the Kuju X pfd can be compared to the Handa pfd because of upper Aso-4 pfd. Therefore, the layer corresponding to the Shimosakata pfd, Ono et al. (1977) reported to found between Aso-4/3 in the Imamura area, is considered to be a pfd that has not been reported to date because the surface geological survey results show it to be lower than the Aso-4 unconsolidated pfd. In addition, this pfd is not founded in the Shimosakata area, a different name other than "Shimosakata" is considered necessary.
[References] Kawanabe et al. (2015) Geological Map of Kuju Volcano, Geological Survey of Japan. Nagaoka and Okuno (2015), Geomorphology, 36, 141-158; Ono, K. et al. (1977), Geological map at 1:50,000, Geology of the Taketa area, Geological Survey of Japan. Yamasaki et al. (2016), Volcanoes, 61, 519-531.