日本地球惑星科学連合2024年大会

講演情報

[E] 口頭発表

セッション記号 A (大気水圏科学) » A-CG 大気海洋・環境科学複合領域・一般

[A-CG33] Multi-scale ocean-atmosphere interaction in the tropics

2024年5月27日(月) 13:45 〜 15:15 201A (幕張メッセ国際会議場)

コンビーナ:Richter Ingo(JAMSTEC Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology)、小坂 優(東京大学先端科学技術研究センター)、林 未知也(国立研究開発法人国立環境研究所)、東塚 知己(東京大学大学院理学系研究科地球惑星科学専攻)、Chairperson:Ingo Richter(JAMSTEC Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology)、林 未知也(国立研究開発法人国立環境研究所)

14:15 〜 14:30

[ACG33-03] On the complexities of ENSO’s influence on the equatorial Atlantic

*Ingo Richter1Tomoki Tozuka2Yu Kosaka2Shoichiro Kido1、Ping Chang3Hiroki Tokinaga4 (1.JAMSTEC Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology、2.University of Tokyo、3.Texas A&M University、4.Kyushu University)

キーワード:ENSO, Atlantic Nino, interbasin interaction, air-sea interaction

Even though El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) has a robust influence on the northern tropical Atlantic, its influence on the equatorial Atlantic is inconsistent. This is perhaps best exemplified by the fact that the extreme 1982 and 1997 El Niño events were followed by Atlantic zonal mode (AZM) events of the opposite sign. Potential reasons for this inconsistent influence are the competition of dynamic and thermodynamic effects, and the timing of ENSO decay.
Here we re-examine this problem using pre-industrial control simulations (piControl) from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Phase 6 (CMIP6). The observed correlation between boreal winter (DJF) sea-surface temperature (SST) in the Niño 3.4 region and the following summer (JJA) SSTs in the ATL3 region is close to zero, indicative of the inconsistent relation between the two. In the CMIP6, however, the relation exhibits a wide range of behaviors with correlations ranging from about -0.5 to +0.5 depending on the model. Despite this inconsistency, the influence of ENSO on surface winds over the equatorial Atlantic is rather robust, with all models showing a negative correlation between boreal spring (MAM) Niño 3.4 SST and MAM surface winds over the western equatorial Atlantic. Taking this robust ENSO influence on the Atlantic surface winds as our starting point, we examine the reasons why the consistent wind forcing does not lead to a consistent SST response in the equatorial Atlantic in CMIP6 simulations.