2:00 PM - 2:15 PM
[SCG45-02] Mechanism of Sedex Mineralization and Sulfide Remobilization integrating Textures, Geochemistry, S and B stable Isotopes—Case Study from Kayad Zn-Pb Deposit, Western India
Keywords:Sedex, Multiple sulfur isotope, Boron isotope, Geochemistry, Critical metal, Ore Geology
In-situ multiple sulfur isotope systematics of all sulfides show consistently positive d34S values irrespective of mineral species, mode of occurrence and texture, and fall within +2.7 and 11.3 ‰. Average D33S and D36S of pyrrhotite and chalcopyrite are -0.01±0.06‰ (2 S.D.) and 0.03±0.02‰ (2 S.D.) respectively with some outlier values up to 0.4‰. Texturally three types of tourmaline are identified: fine grains associated with disseminated and laminated ores, medium grains associated with clots of sulfides and large crystals in pegmatites. Based on X-site vacancy, all tourmaline types belong to alkali group and based on Y-site occupancy, the first two types belong to dravite sub-group whereas the pegmatitic tourmaline belong to schorl sub-group. The d11B compositions of tourmaline of different types are comparable to one another and furnish highly negative values ranging from -10.7‰ to -15.2‰.
This study proposes that the disseminated and laminated Zn-Pb ores at Kayad belong to SEDEX type whereas the massive Zn-Pb ores formed via sulfide partial melting and plastic flow of the pre-existing SEDEX mineralization during regional metamorphism, as evidenced by melt textures, plenitude of LMCEs, peak metamorphic temperature and indistinguishable d34S values between laminated SEDEX ore and massive sulfide ore. It also demonstrates that this form of hybrid mobilization is highly efficient in concentrating critical metals to economic grades. The positive d34S of the laminated/disseminated SEDEX sulfides, and the dravitic composition and negative d11B of co-genetic tourmaline can be best explained by fluid derivation from continental evaporite contrary to the general model for SEDEX mineralization. In contrast, the vein-hosted Fe-Cu sulfides likely formed from granitic hydrothermal fluids, which also aided in the remobilization of the vein-hosted Zn-Pb sulfides, as evidenced by alteration types, schorl to dravitic composition and negative d11B values of tourmaline. Sulfur was probably redistributed from the SEDEX ores during remobilization as indicated by overlapping isotopic compositions