日本地球惑星科学連合2025年大会

講演情報

[E] ポスター発表

セッション記号 A (大気水圏科学) » A-AS 大気科学・気象学・大気環境

[A-AS06] 大気圏(成層圏・対流圏)過程とその気候への影響

2025年5月27日(火) 17:15 〜 19:15 ポスター会場 (幕張メッセ国際展示場 7・8ホール)

コンビーナ:野口 峻佑(九州大学 理学研究院 地球惑星科学部門)、原田 やよい(気象研究所)、西井 和晃(三重大学大学院生物資源学研究科)、江口 菜穂(九州大学 応用力学研究所)



17:15 〜 19:15

[AAS06-P01] Improvement and Issues in Representation of Stratospheric Field in JRA-3Q Reanalysis

*原田 やよい1 (1.気象研究所)

キーワード:再解析、成層圏、気象庁第3次長期再解析、気象庁55年長期再解析、気温、水蒸気

The Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) has conducted the third Japanese global atmospheric reanalysis named Japanese Reanalysis for Three Quarters of a Century (JRA-3Q, Kosaka et al. 2024) using the JMA operational data assimilation system that has been upgraded and improved since the Japanese 55-year Reanalysis (JRA-55, Kobayashi et al. 2015) was conducted. In JRA-3Q data assimilation system, vertical levels are increased up to 100 layers, top level of the system is 0.01 hPa, and non-orographic gravity wave parameterization based on Scinocca (2003) are implemented. In addition, GNSS radio occultation, bending angle is assimilated up to 60 km.
JRA-55 has a large warm bias in the lower mesosphere and cold bias in the upper stratosphere, although it reduced biases in lower stratosphere (Harada et al. 2016). In addition, he recently conducted SPARC Reanalysis Intercomparison Project (Fujiwara et al. 2017) critically assessed the stratospheric water vapor in JRA-55, and concluded that it was excessive and not recommended for use in scientific studies (Davis et al. 2017).
Therefore, we have conducted quality assessment of stratospheric field in JRA-3Q using a dataset based on satellite observation, including the lower mesosphere. The Earth Observing System Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS), onboard the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Aura satellite launched in July 2004 (Aura MLS), has been measuring temperatures, several atmospheric species, cloud ice, and geopotential heights to provide information about the earth’s upper troposphere, stratosphere, and mesosphere (Waters et al. 2006).
With regarding to water vapor, we found that JRA-3Q greatly reduced wet bias observed mainly in mid and high latitudes in JRA-55 as mentioned above. In addition, a comparison of temperature with Aura MLS reveals that JRA-3Q reduces cold bias in the upper stratosphere and warm bias from equatorial regions to mid-latitudes. In particular, the root mean square error has generally been reduced by half in the region. In the high latitudes of the lower mesosphere, JRA-55 showed a cold bias in the winter hemisphere, while JRA-3Q shows an opposite warm bias in the region. In the upper 0.5 hPa layer at high latitudes of the winter hemisphere, the longwave radiative process of JRA-3Q has a rather stronger cooling than that of JRA-55. However, the adiabatic heating due to dynamical processes surpasses the effect of longwave radiation.

Reference:
Davis, S. M., M. I. Hegglin, M. Fujiwara, R. Dragani, Y. Harada, C. Kobayashi, C. Long, G. L. Manney, E. R. Nash, G. L. Potter, S. Tegtmeier, T. Wang, K. Wargan, and J. S. Wright, 2017: Assessment of upper tropospheric and stratospheric water vapor and ozone in reanalyses as part of S-RIP. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 12743–12778.
Fujiwara, M., and Coauthors, 2017: Introduction to the SPARC Reanalysis Intercomparison Project (S-RIP) and overview of the reanalysis systems. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1417–1452.
Harada, Y., and Coauthors, 2016: The JRA-55 reanalysis: Representation of atmospheric circulation and climate variability. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 94, 269–302.
Kobayashi, S., and Coauthors, 2015: The JRA-55 reanalysis: General specifications and basic characteristics. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 93, 5-48.
Kosaka, Y., and Coauthors, 2024: The JRA-3Q reanalysis. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 102, 49-109.
Scinocca, J. F., 2003: An accurate spectral nonorographic gravity wave drag parameterization for general circulation models. J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 667–682.
Waters, J. W., and Coauthors 2006: The Earth Observing System Microwave Limb Sounder (EOS MLS) on the Aura satellite. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 44, 1075–1092.