日本地球惑星科学連合2025年大会

講演情報

[E] ポスター発表

セッション記号 A (大気水圏科学) » A-CG 大気海洋・環境科学複合領域・一般

[A-CG40] 大気・海洋観測の気候・海洋予測へのインパクト評価

2025年5月27日(火) 17:15 〜 19:15 ポスター会場 (幕張メッセ国際展示場 7・8ホール)

コンビーナ:藤井 陽介(気象庁気象研究所)、木戸 晶一郎(海洋研究開発機構 付加価値情報創生部門 アプリケーションラボ)、Tseng Yu-heng(Institute of Oceanography, National Taiwan University)、Xie Jiping(Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center, Norway)


17:15 〜 19:15

[ACG40-P08] High frequency radar error classification and prediction based on K-means methods

*Zhaoyi Wang1,3、Marie Drevilion2、Pierre De Mey-Frémaux4、Elisabeth Remy2、Nadia Ayoub4、Dakui Wang3、Bruno Levier2 (1.Tianjin Key Laboratory for Marine Environmental Research and Service, School of Marine Science and Technology, Tianjin University、2.Mercator Ocean International、3.Key Laboratory of Research on Marine Hazards Forecasting, National Marine Environmental Forecasting Cente、4.Laboratory of Space Geophysical and Oceanographic Studies)

キーワード:HF radar, ocean current, the Bay of Biscay, K-means, error estimate

The K-means classification algorithm based on an improvedEuclidean Distance calculation method that does not take missing values into account was used to characterize the HF radar and numerically simulated 24h low-frequency filtered currents in the south-eastern Bay of Biscay (study area) and to estimate error between observation and simulation. The results for the study area show predominantly eastward (northward) currents over the Spanish (French) continental shelf/slope in winter and more variable currents in the west and south-west in summer. The model classification results for circulation characteristics are in relatively good agreement with HF radar results, especially for currents on the Spanish (French) shelf/slope. In addition, the probabilistic relationship between observed and modeled currents was explored, obtaining the probability of occurrence of modeled current groups when each group of observed currents occurs. Finally, predictions of model and observed current errors were made based on the classification results, and it was found that the predictions based on the classification of all data had the smallest errors, with a 17% improvement over the unclassified control experiment. This study will provide the basis for subsequent model error testing, forecast product improvement and data assimilation.