日本地球惑星科学連合2025年大会

講演情報

[E] 口頭発表

セッション記号 A (大気水圏科学) » A-CG 大気海洋・環境科学複合領域・一般

[A-CG41] 衛星による地球環境観測

2025年5月29日(木) 09:00 〜 10:30 展示場特設会場 (5) (幕張メッセ国際展示場 7・8ホール)

コンビーナ:沖 理子(宇宙航空研究開発機構)、本多 嘉明(千葉大学環境リモートセンシング研究センター)、松永 恒雄(国立環境研究所地球環境研究センター/衛星観測センター)、高橋 暢宏(名古屋大学 宇宙地球環境研究所)、座長:村上 浩(宇宙航空研究開発機構地球観測研究センター)、本多 嘉明(千葉大学環境リモートセンシング研究センター)

09:30 〜 09:45

[ACG41-09] Improved algorithm for the acquisition of atmospheric aerosol optical properties from multi-wavelength, multi-pixel satellite observations

*関口 美保1中島 映至1橋本 真喜子2中田 真木子3石 崇4桃井 裕広5 (1.国立大学法人東京海洋大学、2.宇宙航空研究開発機構、3.近畿大学、4.中国科学院、5.GRASP SAS)

キーワード:衛星観測、エアロゾル、アルゴリズム

The Multi-Wavelength and Multi-Pixel Method (MWPM) is the standard aerosol retrieval algorithm for land surfaces in the GOSAT-2/CAI-2 mission. This method estimates aerosol and surface parameters simultaneously using multi-wavelength and multi-pixel information and is particularly effective for complex terrain, including urban areas and megacities. An updated version of the algorithm, MWPM2, has been developed to improve accuracy. In the present study, the accelerated radiative transfer algorithm was replaced by a state-of-the-art radiative transfer model, RPstar-3, and the aerosol optical properties were revised to better reflect realistic conditions. The aerosol microphysical model consisted of an external mixture of three aerosol types: fine particles, soil dust and sea salt. For fine particles, a mixture of sulphate and black carbon was considered; however, brown carbon was also included in the updated model as black carbon can have unrealistic absorption characteristics, especially at low concentrations. In addition, dust particles were represented as non-spherical Voronoi particles.
In this study, the MWPM2 algorithm, an updated version of the MWPM, was applied to GOSAT-2/CAI-2 and GCOM-C/SGLI observations to estimate aerosol optical thickness (AOT), single scattering albedo (SSA) and Ångström exponent (AE). The comparison with GOSAT-2/CAI-2 data showed a significant improvement in accuracy compared to results derived from the original MWPM. In particular, the estimated accuracy of the aerosol optical thickness in this case was less than 0.09. In contrast, the analysis using SGLI data showed a lower accuracy compared to the GOSAT-2/CAI-2 results. Possible contributing factors include differences in the wavelengths of the bands used and variations in surface reflectance. Further investigation of these discrepancies is required to better understand the underlying causes and to improve accuracy in future applications.