2:15 PM - 2:30 PM
[BPT03-03] Search for diatom biomarkers by lipid analysis of diatom species from North Pacific Ocean

Keywords:Diatom, Steroid, North Pacific Ocean, Biomarkers, Primary productivity
The diatom cultures studied were collected from the North Pacific and harvested. We used 6 species, Chaetoceros debilis, Neodenticula seminae, Proboscia alata, Rhizosolenia hebetata, Stephanopyxis nipponica, and Thalassiosira nordenskioeldii, which are major species in North Pacific Ocean. Lipids were extracted with dichloromethane/methanol, and separated to aliphatic, aromatic, ketone-ester, and polar fractions. Lipids were identified and quantified via GC-MS and GC-FID.
We identified various biomarkers including fatty acids, sterols, and long-chain alkenes. Sterol compositions in the species varied; cholesterol (C27 Δ5) and ostreasterol (C28 Δ5,24) were commonly identified. Ostreasterol is thought to be diatom biomarker because of its detection from only diatom. We examined the possibility of sterols as a comprehensive diatom productivity proxy in geological marine sediments. Also, there were two key biomarkers detected specifically from certain species; 24-norsterol (C26 Δ5,22E), which is thought to be the precursor of 24-norcholestane found in Neogene diatomaceous sediments, was detected from C. debilis. However, the producer(s) of 24-norsterol was unclear. In our study, the 24-norsterol was firstly identified from a cosmopolitan diatom C. debilis. 22-dehydrocholesterol (C27 Δ5,22E) was abundantly detected from N. seminae with high contribution over 75% of total sterols. Considering the most dominance of N. seminae in the North Pacific, the 22-dehydrocholesterol can be typical diatom biomarker in the North Pacific. In addition, C25 HBI alkenes from R. hebetata, and long-chain alkyl-diols from P. alata were unique biomarkers to these species. The significance of these biomarkers and its application as North Pacific diatom productivity proxy will also be discussed.
References
Mann & Vanormelingen., 2013., Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 60, 414-420.
Armbrust., 2009., Nature, 459, 185-192.
Falkowski et al., 2004., Science, 305, 354-360.