日本地球惑星科学連合2025年大会

講演情報

[J] 口頭発表

セッション記号 M (領域外・複数領域) » M-AG 応用地球科学

[M-AG34] ラジオアイソトープ移行:福島第一原発事故環境動態からの展開

2025年5月29日(木) 15:30 〜 17:00 105 (幕張メッセ国際会議場)

コンビーナ:津旨 大輔(筑波大学)、赤田 尚史(弘前大学)、加藤 弘亮(筑波大学アイソトープ環境動態研究センター)、乙坂 重嘉(東京大学大気海洋研究所)、座長:加藤 弘亮(筑波大学アイソトープ環境動態研究センター)、赤田 尚史(弘前大学)

16:00 〜 16:15

[MAG34-08] ALPS処理水の海洋放出時の放射性核種濃度分布の変動

*津旨 大輔1,2、坪野 考樹2三角 和弘2加藤 弘亮1恩田 裕一1乙坂 重嘉3、岡村 知巳4、阿部 博4 (1.筑波大学、2.電力中央研究所、3.東京大学、4.東京電力HD)

キーワード:福島第一原子力発電所事故、APLS処理水、領域海洋モデル、トリチウム

As part of the decommissioning work at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, the discharge of ALPS-treated water began in August 2023. ALPS-treated water contains not only H-3, but also other nuclides, albeit at extremely low concentrations. ALPS-treated water is treated so that the total of the concentration ratios of the 30 target nuclides is less than 1, and then diluted so that the H-3 concentration is less than 1500 Bq/L before being discharged. Prior to discharge, a radiation impact assessment was carried out by TEPCO. This assessment used a marine dispersion model that had been verified using observation results for Cs-137 that had leaked out as a result of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident.
The ocean dispersion model was a 1 km x 1 km ROMS model with a variable mesh that was refined to 200 m x 200 m in the vicinity. It was driven by meteorological reanalysis data from the Japan Meteorological Agency, and data assimilation was performed using JCOPE2M ocean reanalysis data to reproduce the Kuroshio and mesoscale eddies.
In this assessment, a H-3 concentration of 0.1 Bq/L was used as the background concentration from atmospheric nuclear testing. However, a concentration of 1 Bq/L of H-3 was observed even before the release, and this is thought to be due to the influence of the supply from the power plant site or surrounding areas, or from rivers. After taking into account the influence of these background concentrations, the results of the model simulations were verified against the results of the monitoring of H-3 concentrations. Because the rate of release of the ALPS processed water was small, the range of influence of the monitoring of H-3 concentrations was limited, but the verification results were consistent. It is necessary to determine the average distribution by continuing to monitor in the future.