日本地球惑星科学連合2025年大会

講演情報

[E] ポスター発表

セッション記号 S (固体地球科学) » S-CG 固体地球科学複合領域・一般

[S-CG46] Uncovering stress accumulation and fault strengthening of megathrust earthquakes

2025年5月26日(月) 17:15 〜 19:15 ポスター会場 (幕張メッセ国際展示場 7・8ホール)

コンビーナ:小平 秀一(海洋研究開発機構)、氏家 恒太郎(筑波大学生命環境系)、久保田 達矢(国立研究開発法人防災科学技術研究所)、日野 亮太(東北大学大学院理学研究科)

17:15 〜 19:15

[SCG46-P04] Well and seismic reflection data integration/correlation at JTRACK drill sites

*中村 恭之1、Ford Jonathan2、Nicholson Uisdean3宮川 歩夢4濱田 洋平1、Conin Marianne5、Fulton Patrick6、Kirkpatrick Jamie7、Regalla Christine8小平 秀一1氏家 恒太郎9、江口 暢久1、前田 玲奈1奥津 なつみ1Toczko Sean1、- 国際深海科学掘削計画 第405次航海研究者 (1.国立研究開発法人海洋研究開発機構、2.ハンブルク大学、3.ヘリオット・ワット大学、4.国立研究開発法人産業技術総合研究所、5.ロレーヌ大学、6.コーネル大学、7.ネバダ大学、8.北アリゾナ大学、9.筑波大学)

キーワード:日本海溝、JTRACK、Seismic-well tie、国際深海科学掘削計画

During IODP Exp. 405 (JTRACK), we established seismic-well ties using the sonic logging data from the Logging-while-drilling (LWD), and seismic reflection data acquired by JAMSTEC. LWD data were obtained from the seafloor down to the basalt layer at both the prism site (Site C0019, Hole C0019H) and the input site (Site C0026, Hole C0026A). Even though the LWD dataset from C0026 was limited to the real-time data provided via mud pulse telemetry because the tool could not be recovered at this site, we could correlate the drilling results to the seismic data. Time-domain synthetic seismograms were computed from the P-wave velocity data obtained with LWD and tied with the major reflections in the seismic profiles. We used two different seismic datasets at C0019: higher resolution seismic data (HD33L) and deeper penetration seismic data (JFD1). The seismic-well tie was established for each seismic data respectively. Only the higher resolution seismic dataset (HDMY001) was used at Site C0026. We slightly modified the time-depth relationship to align the major reflections. The adjustment amount was ~30 ms at Site C0019, and ~2 ms at C0026. The drilling results in the depth-domain were converted to time-domain using the adjusted time-depth relationship to correlate with the seismic profiles.

Within most of the prism at Site C0019, the correlation between the seismic reflection profiles, both JFD1 and HD33L, and synthetic seismograms were poor, especially in the wavelet phases. However, intervals with higher amplitude synthetic seismograms correspond to those with relatively high amplitudes in seismic profile JFD1. This might be attributed to the offset between the location of the borehole and seismic profile, and the complicated structure observed in the JTRACK core samples.

At Site C0026, most of the reflections in the synthetic seismograms were adequatelycorrelated with the seismic reflection data within the chert interval. In the shallow part, the correspondence between the synthetic seismogram and seismic profile is poor; however, seismic characteristics such as reflection amplitude variations can be correlated with the prescribed lithological units in some intervals. Noticeably, the lithological unit boundary between Unit 1 (mud) and Unit 2 (clay) corresponds to the boundary between the interval with weak and strong seismic reflection within the Seismic Unit 2.

Seismic-well ties established from the LWD and seismic reflection data, combined with the JTRACK drilling results and various post-cruise research will contribute to understanding the shallow plate boundary slip and the tectonics in the Japan Trench subduction zone.