9:30 AM - 9:45 AM
[SVC30-03] Ground deformation before and after the Mauna Loa 2022 eruption and its relationship to the decollement activity

Keywords:Volcano deformation, GNSS, decollement, dike intrusion
Previous studies of ground deformation before the 2022 eruption have revealed significant inflationary ground deformation from 2014 to 2020 through the GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) and InSAR (Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar) measurements (Varugu and Amelung, 2021). In addition, there are few previous studies on post-eruptive crustal deformation. In this study, we calculate ground deformation before and after the 2022 eruption using GNSS measurements and modeled the observation. Our goal is to understand the subsurface magma behavior before and after the eruption and investigate how the 2022 eruption affected the interior of the Mauna Loa volcano.
We employed daily GNSS positions processed and released by the University of Nevada Reno (Blewitt et al., 2018). The ground deformation analysis software pydeform (Munekane et al., 2016) is used to model the observation. The model assumes the inflation of a spherical source, the opening of a dike beneath the summit caldera, and the slip of a decollement fault located southeast of the summit, consistent with previous studies.
Our modeling shows that both the depth of the spherical pressure source and the dike became shallower after the eruption. Additionally, the slip rate of the decollement fault, which was about 38 cm/yr during the year before the eruption, decreased significantly to 0.1 cm/yr after the eruption, indicating that the slip of the decollement fault had almost stopped.
We hypothesized that the stress change by the eruption stopped the slip on the decollement fault. Therefore, we calculated the Coulomb stress change around the decollement fault due to dike intrusions into NERZ during the 2022 eruption using Coulomb 3.3 (Toda et al., 2011). The results indicate that the eruption decreased the Coulomb stress on the decollement by approximately −0.6 bar. Therefore, we interpret that the eruption stopped the slip on the decollement. In addition, seismic activity around the decollement fault (Wilding and Ross, 2024) also decreased after the eruption, further supporting our hypothesis.
