JpGU-AGU Joint Meeting 2017

講演情報

[EJ] 口頭発表

セッション記号 A (大気水圏科学) » A-OS 海洋科学・海洋環境

[A-OS29] [EJ] 海洋と大気の波動・渦・循環力学

2017年5月23日(火) 09:00 〜 10:30 302 (国際会議場 3F)

コンビーナ:古恵 亮(APL/JAMSTEC)、久木 幸治(琉球大学理学部)、三寺 史夫(北海道大学低温科学研究所)、杉本 憲彦(慶應義塾大学 法学部 日吉物理学教室)、座長:三寺 史夫(北海道大学低温科学研究所)、座長:相木 秀則(名古屋大学)、座長:古恵 亮(APL/JAMSTEC)

09:00 〜 09:15

[AOS29-01] Similarities and differences between the Kuroshio Extension and a baroclinic jet in a channel

★招待講演

*中野 英之1辻野 博之1 (1.気象研究所)

キーワード:黒潮続流、傾圧ジェット

There are many similarity in PV structure between the Kuroshio Extension (KE) and a baroclinic jet in a channel (hereafter, just a baroclinic jet). PV along the front has a sharp contrast in the upper layer and nearly homogeneous in the lower layer. For the baroclinic jet, it is proposed that PV contrast is generated due to the suppressed mixing across the front and vigorous mixing at their flanks, resulting in the formation of a eastward narrow jet. Despite the distribution similarity, it is difficult to apply the proposed mechanism directly to the formation of the KE. The PV contrast along the KE is the strongest at the separation and disappears into the interior Sverdrup region, suggesting that its primary source is from the western boundary rather than the barrier effect along the fronts. In fact, eddies reduce the PV contrast in the upstream part of the KE. In addition, the barrier effect is not so simple for the Kuroshio Extension. The KE is a blender for Kuroshio-origin water, whereas it is a barrier for other water masses in the upper layer. From these fact, it seems that the formation and maintenance of the Kuroshio Extension seems essentially different from those of the baroclinic jet. Some diagnostic approaches will be also discussed.