JpGU-AGU Joint Meeting 2017

講演情報

[EE]Eveningポスター発表

セッション記号 M (領域外・複数領域) » M-GI 地球科学一般・情報地球科学

[M-GI28] [EE] Data assimilation: A fundamental approach in geosciences

2017年5月22日(月) 17:15 〜 18:30 ポスター会場 (国際展示場 7ホール)

[MGI28-P05] A Reanalysis Experiment using a Coupled Atmosphere-Ocean Data Assimilation System in JMA/MRI

*藤井 陽介1石橋 俊之1安田 珠幾2高谷 祐平1入口 武史1齊藤 直彬1竹内 義明1 (1.気象庁気象研究所、2.気象庁)

キーワード:Coupled Data Assimilation , Reanalysis, Precipitation, Global Ocean Heat Budget

JMA/MRI have developed a coupled Data Assimilation (DA) system, MRI-CDA1, based on JMA’s operational systems. The system adopts so-called weakly-coupled data assimilation procedure in which a coupled atmosphere-ocean model simulates the time-evolutions of the atmosphere and ocean fields while separated analysis routines generate analysis increments of the atmosphere and the ocean for modification of the coupled model fields. MRI-CDA1 is composed of the global atmosphere DA system for numerical weather predictions, NAPEX, the global ocean DA system for seasonal predictions, MOVE-G2, and the coupled atmosphere-ocean model for seasonal predictions, JMA/MRI-CGCM2.

MRI-CDA1 is applied to a coupled reanalysis experiment for the period from November 2013 to December 2015. Comparison of the reanalysis result with Japanese 55-year Reanalysis (JRA-55) indicates that the overestimation of the sea surface latent heat flux found in JRA-55 disappears in the reanalysis of MRI-CDA1. Consequently, the coupled system improved the global ocean heat budget. MRI-CDA1 also effectively suppresses the excess rainfall in the tropics in JRA-55, particularly in the Intertropcal Convergence Zone (ITCZ) in the Pacific. Anomaly correlation coefficients of precipitation in MRI-CDA1 with observation-based datasets (CMAP and GPCP) have quite similar distributions with the distribution for JRA-55, but decreases in a few areas. Although the sea surface temperature field is well reproduced by MRI-CDA1, the equatorial Pacific thermocline is shallower and the Pacific Equatorial Undercurrent is weaker than those in an uncoupled ocean reanalysis generated by MOVE-G2. These differences are likely to stem from difference of the bulk formula of the wind stress fields which force the ocean model.