JpGU-AGU Joint Meeting 2017

講演情報

[JJ] 口頭発表

セッション記号 H (地球人間圏科学) » H-SC 社会地球科学・社会都市システム

[H-SC08] [JJ] 地球温暖化防止と地学(CO2地中貯留・有効利用、地球工学)

2017年5月20日(土) 13:45 〜 15:15 301B (国際会議場 3F)

コンビーナ:徳永 朋祥(東京大学大学院新領域創成科学研究科環境システム学専攻)、薛 自求(公益財団法人 地球環境産業技術研究機構)、徂徠 正夫(国立研究開発法人産業技術総合研究所地圏資源環境研究部門)、座長:徂徠 正夫(国立研究開発法人産業技術総合研究所地圏資源環境研究部門)

14:45 〜 15:00

[HSC08-05] Acoustic sonar detectability of gas bubbles from seafloor for environmental monitoring at offshore CO2 storage sites

*中村 孝道1西村 真1内本 圭亮1 (1.公益財団法人地球環境産業技術研究機構地球環境産業技術研究所CO2貯留研究グループ)

キーワード:海域環境モニタリング、二酸化炭素海底下貯留、音響探査技術、漏出検出

Geological CO2 storage is proposed in sedimentary formations. Because storage sites are selected deliberately to minimize the risk of leakage, CO2 is assumed to be stable in the reservoirs. CO2 leakages from geological storage systems are unlikely, but still possible. At offshore CO2 storage site, CO2 could leak out from the seafloor into the seawater. CO2 leakage may lead to significant effects on the local environment. From the public and stakeholders, concerns about the risk of in situ leakage and ecological impacts are emerging. Therefore, it is the most important verification for geological CO2 storage project that there is no detectable leakage or migration of CO2 by environmental monitoring. Appropriate environmental monitoring methods and public communications are lead to secure social license and also needed to progress of safety geological CO2 storage project. Further, in Japan, operators of offshore CCS are required to plan monitoring programs, as stated in the Act for the Prevention of Marine Pollution and Maritime Disasters. In the monitoring plan, an operator has to be able to determine the location and extent of any CO2 leakage. Consequently, it is necessary to develop detection methods of CO2 leakage in the sea.
For offshore environmental monitoring, acoustic methods were expected that could direct detection of CO2 bubbles in the seawater. It was described that effectiveness of acoustic methods for seafloor and water column monitoring in IEAGHG special report (IEAGHG, 2012). In practice, it was used in seafloor survey of several offshore geological CO2 storage projects. For example, in Sleipner, side scan sonar (SSS) and multibeam echo sounder systems (MBES) were used for seafloor observations on storage site (www.eco2-project.eu). In QICS project (Blackford et al., 2014) that CO2 controlled release experiment from shallow seafloor, clearly images of both gas plume within the water column and pockmarks on the seafloor obtained using MBES (Cevatoglu et al., 2015). Furthermore, gas flux quantification using hydrophone, passive acoustic method was shown (Bergès et al., 2015). However, there were no data about flow rates of released CO2 and MBES image data was used as check the location of releasing point. Detectability of acoustic methods was unclear.
This paper focuses specifically on the detectability of active acoustic method. Controlled compressed air release experiments were carried out in shallow inner bay at the depth of 5 to 6 m. Observations using active acoustic instruments such as multibeam sonar (MBS) and SSS were deployed to assess its detectability for gas bubbles stream.Analysis of the image acquired by active acoustic instruments led to the following conclusions:
·Images of MBS data could detect gas bubbles stream. The survey using MBS have the potential to be effective method for localization of leakage point in narrow area.
·Images of SSS data could detect gas bubbles stream. Images of SSS data showed high detectability of gas bubbles stream The survey using SSS have the potential to be effective method for detection of CO2 leakage and localization of leakage point.
·Image processing and analyzing of SSS data, the quantification data of gas bubbles stream were obtained. Flow rates from any image data could estimate within order of magnitude, with relative high quantification accuracy.
·The survey using SSS have the potential to be effective method for not only leakage detection but also leakage scale grasp. The broad seafloor survey using active acoustic instruments such as SSS is crucial point of efficient leakage detection and localization.

Bergès, B.J.P., Leighton, T.G., White P.R. (2015) Passive acoustic quantification of gas fluxes during contlloed gas release experiments. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Cont. 38, 64-79.
Blackford, J., Stahl, H., Bull, J.M., et al. (2014) Detection and impacts of leakage from sub-seafloor deep geological carbon dioxide storage. Nat. Clim. Chang. 4, 1011–1016.
Cevatoglu, M., Bull, J.M., et al. (2015) Gas migration pathways, controlling mechanisms and changes in sediment acoustic properties observed in a controlled sub-seabed CO2 release experiment. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Cont.38, 26-43.
IEAGHG. (2012) Quantification Techniques for CO2 Leakage. Report. 2012/02.