JpGU-AGU Joint Meeting 2017

講演情報

[EJ] 口頭発表

セッション記号 M (領域外・複数領域) » M-AG 応用地球科学

[M-AG34] [EJ] 福島原発事故により放出された放射性核種の環境動態

2017年5月25日(木) 09:00 〜 10:30 コンベンションホールA (国際会議場 2F)

コンビーナ:北 和之(茨城大学理学部)、恩田 裕一(筑波大学アイソトープ環境動態研究センター)、五十嵐 康人(気象研究所 環境・応用気象研究部)、山田 正俊(弘前大学被ばく医療総合研究所)、座長:五十嵐 康人(気象研究所 環境・応用気象研究部)、座長:北 和之(茨城大学)

10:00 〜 10:15

[MAG34-05] 大気モデル相互比較に基づく福島第一原発事故起源の137Csの動態解析

*北山 響1森野 悠1滝川 雅之2中島 映至3速水 洋4永井 晴康1寺田 宏明5斉藤 和雄6新堀 敏基6梶野 瑞王6関山 剛6Didier Damien7Mathieu Anne7大原 利眞1鶴田 治雄8,9大浦 泰嗣10海老原 充10柴田 徳思11 (1.国立環境研究所、2.海洋研究開発機構、3.宇宙航空研究開発機構、4.電力中央研究所、5.日本原子力研究開発機構、6.気象庁気象研究所、7.Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire、8.リモート・センシング技術センター、9.東京大学、10.首都大学東京、11.日本アイソトープ協会)

キーワード:モデル相互比較、セシウム-137、福島第一原発事故

After the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant (FDNPP) accident in March 2011, atmospheric simulation models played important roles in understanding the atmospheric behaviors of radionuclides. For the evaluation of the validity and variability of model results, model inter-comparison provides valuable and useful information. In this study, we compared results of seven atmospheric transport models to simulate atmospheric 137Cs released from the FDNPP. All of model results used in this analysis were submitted for the model inter-comparison project of Science Council of Japan (2014). Model reproducibility was assessed from comparison with the observed hourly atmospheric concentrations of 137Cs at 90 sites in Tohoku and Kanto regions (Tsuruta et al., 2014).
Tsuruta et al. (2014) identified 9 plumes (P1 – P9) which passed over Tohoku and/or Kanto regions. P1, P5 and P6 passed through the northern coastal area of Fukushima prefecture to the Pacific Ocean from FDAPP in the night of March 13, morning of 18th and afternoon of 19th, respectively. P2, P4, P7 and P9 reached Kanto region in the morning of 15th, morning of 16th, afternoon of 20th and morning of 21st, respectively. P3 and P8 widely spread over Fukushima prefecture in the afternoon of 15th and night of 20th, respectively.
On average, performance of the models was the best for P2 with FA2 (fraction of simulated data that reproduced the observations within a factor of 2) of 10% ~ 40%. Model performance for P1, P3 and P8 was moderate with FA2 of 0%~10%. The models generally reproduced the observed 137Cs concentrations in plumes which widely spread inland of Tohoku or Kanto regions (P2, P3, and P8). By contrast, the models largely underestimated the observed 137Cs concentrations for P4, P5, and P6, which passed coastal areas of Japan.
Ensemble average of seven models showed reasonable performance for most of plumes, and no individual models reproduced better that the ensemble average for all the plumes. These results suggest that ensemble average is effective for reliable and stable simulation of radioactive plumes.

References
Science Council of Japan, September 2, 2014.
Tsuruta et al., Scientific Reports, 4:6717, 2014.

Fig. (top) Observed and simulated average concentrations of 137Cs in nine radioactive plumes ([Observed-137Cs] ≥ 10 Bq m-3). (bottom) Fraction of simulated data that reproduced the observations within a factor of 2, 5, and 10 (FA2, FA5, FA10, respectively).