JpGU-AGU Joint Meeting 2017

Presentation information

[JJ] Poster

M (Multidisciplinary and Interdisciplinary) » M-IS Intersection

[M-IS23] [JJ] Paleoclimatology and paleoceanography

Tue. May 23, 2017 3:30 PM - 5:00 PM Poster Hall (International Exhibition Hall HALL7)

convener:Tomohisa Irino(Faculty of Environmental Earth Science, Hokkaido University), Akira Oka(Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, The University of Tokyo), Ikuko Kitaba(Research Centre for Palaleoclimatology, Ritsumeikan University), Masaki Sano(Research Institute for Humanity and Nature)

[MIS23-P11] Measurement of sungkai tree-ring width from Jogjakarta, Indonesia

*Shigenori Iitsuka1, Yumiko Watanabe1, Takahiro Tagami1 (1.Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University)

Keywords:tree-ring, ring width, paleoclimate

Because equatorial monsoon and ENSO strongly influence on the climate of Indonesia, Indonesia is important place to understand these climate systems. However, modern meteorological observation in Indonesia lacks long-term data and observation stations. Therefore, it is necessary to reconstruct long-term climate changes by using some proxies. In the proxy such as stalagmite and ice core, tree-ring have an advantage that it records climate data with high time resolution.

Paleoclimatological researches using tree-ring have been conducted in Indonesia. Although almost trees in the tropics don’t make tree-rings, teak and sungkai make tree-rings exceptionally. Teak has been studied so far, but there are only small number of studies about sungkai. Understanding differences between responses of teak and sungkai to the climate makes it possible to compare the two species, and that is useful in reconstructing paleoclimate.

In this study, we observed three sungkai disk samples (samiga1, samiga2, samiga3) from Jogjakarta, Indonesia, and measured tree-ring widths in order to increase numbers of studies about sungkai. We confirmed that outermost tree-ring formed in 2014. Because of tree-ring widths and shapes, we presumed that samiga2 and samiga3 was sampled from the same tree. A false ring wasn’t observed in samiga1. Samiga2 had some doubtful rings. By comparing samiga2 with samiga1 and sungkaiNAN7 (Tamura, 2008), we concluded that samiga2 has two false rings. Thus, we concluded that samiga1 has 28 tree-rings, and samiga2 has 37 tree-rings.

However, it is a problem that the number of samples for comparison is small, and sungkaiNAN7 sampled at Serang. To compare sungkai with teak, it is need to analyze more samples from the same area.