JpGU-AGU Joint Meeting 2017

講演情報

[EE] ポスター発表

セッション記号 P (宇宙惑星科学) » P-EM 太陽地球系科学・宇宙電磁気学・宇宙環境

[P-EM14] [EE] Dynamics in magnetosphere and ionosphere

2017年5月20日(土) 10:45 〜 12:15 ポスター会場 (国際展示場 7ホール)

コンビーナ:堀 智昭(東京大学大学院理学系研究科)、田中 良昌(国立極地研究所)、中溝 葵(情報通信研究機構 電磁波計測研究所)、尾崎 光紀(金沢大学理工研究域電子情報学系)

[PEM14-P28] Spatiotemporal variation of precipitating electron energy in auroral vortices

*田中 良昌1小川 泰信1門倉 昭1Kauristie Kirsti2Enell Carl-fredrik3Braendstroem Urban4Sergienko Tima4Gustavsson Bjorn5Whiter Daniel6Kozlovsky Alexander7宮岡 宏1Kosch Mike8 (1.国立極地研究所、2.フィンランド気象研究所、3.EISCAT科学協会、4.スウェーデン宇宙物理研究所、5.ノルウェー北極大学、6.サウサンプトン大学、7.ソダンキュラ地球物理観測所、8.南アフリカ国立宇宙機関)

キーワード:auroral vortex structure, precipitating electron energy, tomography analysis, EISCAT radar, magnetosphere - ionosphere coupling

We investigated dynamic vortex structures in discrete arcs observed by multi-point monochromatic (427.8nm) imagers in Northern Europe at 22:15-22:20 UT on March 14, 2015. We applied auroral computed tomography method to the multiple images taken at 2 second interval by three all-sky EMCCD imagers and at 5 second interval by four wide-view CCD imagers, and reconstructed a 3D distribution of auroral emission and a horizontal 2D distribution of energy of precipitating electrons. The reconstructed 3D distribution of the auroral emission was compared with height profiles of ionospheric electron density along a field line simultaneously observed by EISCAT UHF radar at Tromso, Norway.
The analysis results are summarized as follows. (1) Averaged energy of auroral precipitating electrons was higher around the center of auroral vortices than the other location of the discrete arcs. (2) Total energy flux of precipitating electrons was proportional to the square of the averaged energy. (3) The shape of height profiles of the 427.8nm emission was very similar to that of the electron density profiles. (4) The electron density estimated from the 427.8nm emission by using empirical atmosphere models was about 2.5 to 3 times smaller than observed by EISCAT UHF radar. The result (1) is consistent with the Ohm’s law along a field line, i.e., the field-aligned current (FAC) is proportional to the field-aligned potential difference. If the discrete arcs were caused by electron precipitation from the auroral acceleration region (AAR) where the Ohm’s law is satisfied, the electron energy (proportional to the potential difference) should have been high around the center of vortex where FAC is large. The result (2) strongly supports this inference. As for the item (4), the difference between the electron density estimated from the optical emission and that observed by EISCAT radar may be explained by an uncertainty of some atmospheric parameters derived from empirical models, in particular, an effective recombination coefficient. We discuss the dynamics of the auroral vortices in terms of the magnetosphere – ionosphere coupling.