JpGU-AGU Joint Meeting 2017

Presentation information

[EE] Oral

S (Solid Earth Sciences) » S-SS Seismology

[S-SS06] [EE] From Earthquake Source and Seismicity Parameters to Fault Properties and Strong-motion Assessment

Thu. May 25, 2017 1:45 PM - 3:15 PM A05 (Tokyo Bay Makuhari Hall)

convener:Takahiko Uchide(Research Institute of Earthquake and Volcano Geology, Geological Survey of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST)), Bogdan Enescu(Department of Geophysics, Kyoto University), Hiroki Sone(University of Wisconsin-Madison), Chairperson:Takahiko Uchide(Research Institute of Earthquake and Volcano Geology, Geological Survey of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST)), Chairperson:Hiroki Sone(University of Wisconsin-Madison)

2:45 PM - 3:00 PM

[SSS06-11] Seismogenic width controls nucleation and aspect ratio of earthquake ruptures

★Invited papers

*Hongfeng Yang1, Huihui Weng1 (1.Chinese University of Hong Kong)

Keywords:seismogenic width, rupture nucleation, rupture aspect ratio

Whether the magnitude of earthquakes depends on the nucleation process is a key question in earthquake physics. Several observations of strike-slip and dip-slip earthquakes suggest that the eventual earthquake moment may increase with the size of the nucleation zone. However, it has also been proposed that the earthquake sizes may be not nucleation-related. We investigate the effect of seismogenic width on nucleation and aspect ratio of earthquake ruptures using numerical simulations of strike-slip faulting with a finite seismogenic depth (width). The seismogenic width has a significant effect on rupture propagation by controlling the energy balance near rupture tips. If the seismogenic width is smaller than a critical value, ruptures cannot propagate along the seismogenic fault continually, regardless of the size of the nucleation zone. The seismic moments of these self-arresting ruptures increase with the nucleation size, forming nucleation-related events. The aspect ratios increase with the seismogenic width but are generally smaller than 8, consistent with observations. In contrast, ruptures are breakaway ruptures and tend to have high aspect ratios (>8) if the seismogenic width is sufficiently large. But the critical nucleation size for breakaway rupture is larger than the theoretical estimate for an unbounded fault. The eventual seismic moments of breakaway ruptures do not depend on the nucleation size. Our results suggest that estimating final earthquake magnitude from the nucleation phase may only be plausible on faults with small seismogenic widths.