JpGU-AGU Joint Meeting 2017

Presentation information

[EE] Oral

S (Solid Earth Sciences) » S-SS Seismology

[S-SS08] [EE] Earthquake Modeling and Simulation

Mon. May 22, 2017 1:45 PM - 3:15 PM A02 (Tokyo Bay Makuhari Hall)

convener:Eiichi Fukuyama(National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention), John B Rundle(University of California Davis), Yukitoshi Fukahata(Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University), Chairperson:Ryosuke Ando(Graduate School of Science, University of Tokyo), Chairperson:Yukitoshi Fukahata(DPRI, Kyoto University)

1:45 PM - 2:00 PM

[SSS08-07] Comparison of the initial rupture processes between the Mw 6.2 mainshock and the Mw 4.1 largest foreshock of the central Tottori earthquake on October 21, 2016

*Shunta Noda1, William L. Ellsworth2 (1.Railway Technical Research Institute, 2.Stanford University)

Keywords:Initial rupture, Nucleation, The 2016 central Tottori earthquake, Slip inversion, Kinematic modeling, Deterministic property

It is one of the essential questions in seismology whether or not the rupture termination of an earthquake is deterministic at the time of initiation (e.g., Iio, 2009). To investigate this issue, Noda and Ellsworth (2016, GRL) statistically characterized initial P waves using Japanese K-NET dataset. They concluded that the P-wave displacement began in a similar way at the onset and departed from the similarity earlier for smaller events in the magnitude range up to Mw 7. The departure time (Tdp) is approximately 30% of typical source duration, implying a connection between initial rupture process and the final earthquake size. To discuss this, we model slip histories during the initial stages of the Mw 6.2 central Tottori earthquake on October 21, 2016 in Japan and its largest foreshock of Mw 4.1 that occurred about two hours before the mainshock. Because these hypocenters are co-located and the focal mechanisms are identical according to the JMA catalog, we invert them using the same empirical Green's functions derived from other foreshocks. We use the Hi-net records surrounding the hypocenters and solve a linear system defined by the representation theorem for seismic sources using non-negative least squares method (Lawson and Hanson, 1974). Our result demonstrates that both ruptures initiate in a similar way until approximately 0.2 s after the nucleations. For the foreshock, the rapid growth completes at about 0.2 s which is consistent with Tdp and the duration of the “growth stage” (Uchide and Ide, 2010). On the other hand, for the mainshock, it continues to grow up rapidly even after 0.2 s. We consider that this variation in initiating process may have resulted in the difference of the final sizes.