The 53rd Annual Meeting of Japanese Society of Pediatric Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery

Presentation information

AP Target Symposium

AP Target Symposium 3 (II-APT3)
Dealing with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries - Efforts to minimize late development of systemic ventricular dysfunction

Sat. Jul 8, 2017 10:15 AM - 11:45 AM ROOM 3 (Exhibition and Event Hall Room 3)

Chair:Yih-Sharng Chen(National Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan)
Chair:Jun Yoshimoto(Pediatric Cardiology, Shizuoka Children's Hospital, Japan)

10:15 AM - 11:45 AM

[II-APT3-05] The Senning operation in anatomical repair of congenitally corrected transposition

James S. Tweddell (Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, USA)

Current controversies in the management of the patient with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (ccTGA) revolve around the best choice of procedure among the choices of physiologic repair, anatomic repair and single ventricle palliation.(1-3) While anatomic correction of ccTGA aims to improve long term outcome by placing the morphologic left ventricle (LV) as the systemic ventricle and avoiding systemic right ventricular failure the long-term outlook is complicated by a high rate of re-intervention, conduction abnormalities combined with systemic left ventricular dysfunction. Options for the atrial level switch component of the anatomic correction include; the Senning operation, the Mustard procedure or the so called hemi-Mustard combined with a bidirectional Glenn shunt.(4) To maximize the benefit of anatomic repair and limit reoperations, an atrial level switch that minimizes sinus node dysfunction, baffle obstruction and supraventricular arrhythmias is essential.(5-7) While, potentially more complicated to perform the Senning procedure uses native tissue and results in a low rate of late baffle obstruction. Technical strategies to avoid sinus node dysfunction can be successfully applied.(8) The Senning, as opposed the hemi-Mustard, maintains the superior caval vein connection to the atrium which may be important for access for pacemaker and arrhythmia management. The steps of the Senning procedure will be demonstrated with a video and the late outcomes reviewed.

1. Shin'oka T, Kurosawa H, Imai Y, Aoki M, Ishiyama M, Sakamoto T, et al. Outcomes of definitive surgical repair for congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries or double outlet right ventricle with discordant atrioventricular connections: risk analyses in 189 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133(5):1318-28, 28 e1-4.
2. Hsu KH, Chang CI, Huang SC, Chen YS, Chiu IS. 17-year experience in surgical management of congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries: a single-centre's experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;49(2):522-7.
3. Alomair M, Moran C, Al Jughiman M, Caldarone C, Mertens L, Oeschslin E, et al. Should All Patients with CC-TGA Undergo Anatomic Repair? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;In Press.
4. Malhotra SP, Reddy VM, Qiu M, Pirolli TJ, Barboza L, Reinhartz O, et al. The hemi-Mustard/bidirectional Glenn atrial switch procedure in the double-switch operation for congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries: rationale and midterm results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141(1):162-70.
5. Horer J, Schreiber C, Dworak E, Cleuziou J, Prodan Z, Vogt M, et al. Long-term results after the Rastelli repair for transposition of the great arteries. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83(6):2169-75.
6. Wells WJ, Blackstone E. Intermediate outcome after Mustard and Senning procedures: A study by the Congenital Heart Surgeons Society. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu. 2000;3:186-97.
7. Horer J, Karl E, Theodoratou G, Schreiber C, Cleuziou J, Prodan Z, et al. Incidence and results of reoperations following the Senning operation: 27 years of follow-up in 314 patients at a single center. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;33(6):1061-7; discussion 7-8.
8. Litwin SB, Bhavani SS. The Senning procedure for repair of d-transposition of the great arteries. J Card Surg. 1987;2(4):415-28.