JpGU-AGU Joint Meeting 2017

講演情報

[EE] 口頭発表

セッション記号 S (固体地球科学) » S-SS 地震学

[S-SS05] [EE] 統計および物理モデルに基づく地震活動予測

2017年5月24日(水) 13:45 〜 15:15 A05 (東京ベイ幕張ホール)

コンビーナ:Schorlemmer Danijel(GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences)、平田 直(東京大学地震研究所)、Matt Gerstenberger(GNS Science)、鶴岡 弘(東京大学地震研究所)、庄 建倉(統計数理研究所)、座長:鶴岡 弘(東京大学地震研究所)、座長:楠城 一嘉(静岡県立大学)

14:00 〜 14:15

[SSS05-02] 前震活動に基づく地震発生の経験的予測
-前震を伴いやすい5領域および日本内陸地域への適用-

*前田 憲二1弘瀬 冬樹1 (1.気象研究所)

キーワード:earthquake prediction, foreshocks, statistics, performance

1. Introduction
Generally it is quite difficult to distinguish foreshocks from background seismicity before a mainshock occurs. However, it is known that some activities like swarms tend to be followed by large earthquakes. We have investigated statistical features of swarm-like activity and searched for the best parameters to define foreshocks. So far, we have reported that such defined foreshock activities are particularly effective for specific three regions in Japan: along the Japan trench, off the Izu peninsula region, and in the north-central Nagano prefecture. In this study we report the current status of prediction performance for these three regions basing on the latest data and also the results for newly investigated regions: the central part of Kyushu and the San-in districts. Besides, we also demonstrate the preliminary results of prediction performance for the inland area of Japan using the temporally applied parameters.

2. Method
The method to search for parameters for foreshocks that present high prediction performance consists of four steps. 1) To eliminate small aftershocks from the original data. 2) To define foreshock candidates satisfying the condition that earthquakes of count Nf with magnitude >= Mf0 occur in the segment of the size of D x D degree (latitude x longitude) during the period of Tf days. 3) To set the alarm period of Ta days during which a mainshock is expected to occur after a foreshock candidate is found. 4) To search for the values of D, Mf0, Tf, Nf and Ta which give high prediction performance for mainshocks with M >= Mm0 by the grid search method. The prediction performance is measured mainly by dAIC that is defined as the difference of AIC for a stationary Poisson model and a foreshock-based model mentioned above, and additionally by alarm rate (AR: the fraction of mainshocks alarmed), truth rate (TR: the fraction of foreshock candidates followed by a mainshock), and probability gain (PG: the ratio of mainshock occurrence rate in the predicted space-time to background occurrence rate).

3. Data and Results
1) Along the Japan Trench
We applied the above method to the earthquakes in three regions along the Japan trench, i.e., off Iwate, off Miyagi and off Ibaraki, cataloged by JMA. The prediction performance for the latest period from 1961 to 1/31/2017 is expressed as AR=27% (=13/48) and TR=22% (=17/77) for Mm0=6.0 by applying the best parameters (D=0.5 degree, Mf0=5.0, Tf=10 days, Nf=3, and Ta=4 days) obtained for the period of 1961-2010.

2) Off the Izu Peninsula
The prediction performance from 1977 to 1/31/2017 resulted in AR=68% (=44/65) and TR=22% (=44/197) for Mm0=5.0 by applying the best parameters (D=0.2 degree, Mf0=3.0, Tf=3 days, Nf=3, and Ta=5 days) obtained for the period of 1977-6/30/2013.

3) North-central Nagano Prefecture
The prediction performance from 1998 to 1/31/2017 resulted in AR=45% (=5/11) and TR=11% (=8/70) for Mm0=5.0 by applying the best parameters (D=0.1 degree, Mf0=2.0, Tf=1 day, Nf=5, and Ta=5 days) obtained for the period of 1998-2014.

4) Central Kyushu District
The prediction performance from 1970 to 1/31/2017 resulted in AR=31% (=4/13) and TR=6.5% (=3/46) for Mm0=5.0 by applying the best parameters (D=0.1 degree, Mf0=3.0, Tf=10 days, Nf=3, and Ta=12 days) obtained for the period of 1977-3/31/2016.

5) San-in District
The prediction performance from 1977 to 1/31/2017 resulted in AR=24% (=5/21) and TR=11% (=4/37) for Mm0=5.0 by applying the best parameters (D=0.1 degree, Mf0=3.0, Tf=1 day, Nf=2, and Ta=24 days) obtained for the period of 1977-12/31/2016.

6) Inland of Japan
The prediction performance from 1977 to 1/31/2017 resulted in AR=12% (=23/190) and TR=4.6% (=30/657) for Mm0=5.0 by applying the same parameters for off the Izu peninsula region.