日本地球惑星科学連合2021年大会

講演情報

[J] 口頭発表

セッション記号 A (大気水圏科学) » A-AS 大気科学・気象学・大気環境

[A-AS07] スーパーコンピュータを用いた気象・気候・環境科学

2021年6月4日(金) 09:00 〜 10:30 Ch.07 (Zoom会場07)

コンビーナ:八代 尚(国立研究開発法人国立環境研究所)、川畑 拓矢(気象研究所)、宮川 知己(東京大学 大気海洋研究所)、寺崎 康児(理化学研究所計算科学研究センター)、座長:八代 尚(国立研究開発法人国立環境研究所)

10:00 〜 10:15

[AAS07-05] A 1000-member 14-km mesh global ensemble experiment to target typhoon FAXAI (2019)

*山田 洋平1、中野 満寿男1、宮川 知己2、小玉 知央1、Chen Ying-Wen2、八代 尚3、那須野 智江1、佐藤 正樹2 (1.国立研究開発法人 海洋研究開発機構、2.東京大学大気海洋研究所、3.国立環境研究所)

キーワード:大アンサンブル実験、高解像度全球非静力学モデル、2019年台風15号Faxai

A thousand members ensemble experiment on the Supercomputer Fugaku was conducted by a nonhydrostatic icosahedral atmospheric model (NICAM) with a 14-km mesh, which was targeted to Typhoon Faxai of which the genesis time is 18UTC 4 September 2019. Ensemble simulations started from different initial dates from 26 August 2019 to 4 September (10 days). NICAM-LETKF JAXA Research Analysis (NEXRA) was used as the initial atmospheric condition of the ensemble experiment. The NEXRA provided 100 perturbed atmospheric conditions for each initial date. The total number of ensemble members was 1000 in the present study. The sea surface temperature was calculated by a slab ocean model, which was nudged to NOAA OI SST V2.1. The ensemble experiments ran for about 30 days. We simply regarded a simulated typhoon generated from 00UTC 3 September to 18UTC 7 September within 140E-170E as a Faxai-like typhoon.
In the ensemble experiment, 391 members reproduced the Faxai-like typhoon. Focusing on impact of lead time on the reproducibility of the genesis time and intensity, fewer number of ensemble members with the short lead time reproduced the Faxai-like typhoon than that of members with the long lead time. This is a possible reason why the short lead time is insufficient for a vortex being intensified, which may become a typhoon. As for tracks of the Faxai-like typhoon, these tracks differed between members of which even experiments started from the same initial date. The variations were more prominent in the long lead time experiments than those of the short lead time experiments.