Japan Geoscience Union Meeting 2021

Presentation information

[J] Poster

A (Atmospheric and Hydrospheric Sciences ) » A-CC Cryospheric Sciences & Cold District Environment

[A-CC25] Glaciology in the new normal

Thu. Jun 3, 2021 5:15 PM - 6:30 PM Ch.04

convener:Hiroto Nagai(Waseda Univ., School of Education), Kzutaka Tateyama(National University Corporation Kitami Institute of Technology), Ishikawa Mamoru(Hokkaido University), Keiko Konya(Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology)

5:15 PM - 6:30 PM

[ACC25-P05] Polar snow monitoring by satellite microwave radiometer

*Nuerasimuguli Alimasi1, Hiroyuki Enomoto1 (1.National Institute of Polar Research)

Keywords:melt, DAV, glacier and ice sheets

The melting of snow covered areas, glacier and ice sheets is important information for the effects of climate change, the water cycle, and disaster prevention. Satellite observations are used to observe melting. There are methods such as investigating changes in the reflection characteristics of snow and ice with visible and near infrared observation, investigating that the temperature of snow and ice reaches the melting point by infrared observation, and detecting water contains by microwave radiation. Microwave observations, which allow observation of melting in all weather and at night, have been used since satellite microwave observations became possible in the 1980s. A method called XPGR (Cross-Polarization Gradient Ratio) has been used as the main observation algorithm since the latter half of the 1990s, and has been used for climate change research as an index of ice sheet melting. In addition, a method called the Diurnal Amplitude observation Variation (DAV) has been used to observe melting in snowy areas on land by observing daytime melting and nighttime freezing. The current study investigated the characteristics and precautions for use of XPGR and DAV.
In this study, we compared XPGR and DAV using ASMR_E and AMSR2 data. Although it is effective for DAV that the observation times are 13:30 (Ascending) and 01:30 (Descending). It turns out that XPGR should be careful when using Ascending data. XPGR was expected to overlook melting when it melted and the surface moisture increased.