11:45 AM - 12:00 PM
[MIS14-05] Oxygen isotopic systematics of chondrules in Tagish Lake (C2) and implications of volatiles in the protoplanetary disk
Keywords:Tagish Lake meteorite, Chondrule, Oxygen isotope, SIMS
In addition to these two types chondrules, FeO-rich chondrules with higher Δ17O values (Δ17O ≧ 0‰) were found in Tagish Lake meteorite [3]. Such chondrules have been found in Tagish Lake-like meteorites [4], CR chondrites [2 and references therein] and the comet Wild 2 returned samples [e.g., 5, 6]. Since comet Wild 2 is originally a Kuiper belt object and Tagish Lake meteorite is possibly derived from a D-type asteroid [7], the occurrence of FeO-rich chondrules with higher Δ17O values in Tagish Lake and comet Wild 2 suggests existence of a more 16O-depleted oxidizing agent further out than the outer main belt. Recently, Fujiya et al. [8] found the evidence for accretion of CO2 ice as well as H2O ice into the parent body of Tagish Lake meteorite. Higher Δ17O values of FeO-rich chondrules in Tagish Lake and comet Wild 2 may represent higher Δ17O values of the chemically distinct icy components existed in the outermost part of chondrule-forming environment.
The 26Al-26Mg systematics of chondrules show that the initial 26Al/27Al values of FeO-rich chondrules from comet Wild 2 and CR chondrites (< 3×10-6) are significantly lower than those of typical chondrules in CO and CV chondrites (~5×10-6) [e.g., 9, 10], suggesting that the former group of chondrules formed more than one million years later than the formation of the latter group of chondrules. The occurrence of more 16O-depleted oxidizing agent can be results of temporal isotopic evolution of icy components in the protoplanetary disk.
Although we cannot tell either spatial heterogeneity or temporal change of the oxygen isotopic composition of the oxidizing agents formed distinct FeO-rich chondrule groups (Δ17O ~ −2‰ or ≧ 0‰), we suggest that oxygen isotopic compositions of chondrules would be important constrains for better understanding of volatile components in the protoplanetary disk.
References:
[1] Ushikubo T. et al. (2012) GCA, 90, 242-240.
[2] Tenner T. J. et al. (2018) Chapter 8 in Chondrules (Cambridge Univ. press).
[3] Ushikubo T. and Kimura M. (2021) GCA, 293, 328-343.
[4] Yamanobe M. et al. (2018) Polar Science, 15, 29-38.
[5] Nakamura T. et al. (2008) Science, 321, 1664-1667.
[6] Nakashima D. et al. (2012) EPSL, 358, 355-365.
[7] Hiroi T. et al. (2001) Science, 293, 2234-2236.
[8] Fujiya W. et al. (2019) Nature Astornomy, 3, 910-915.
[9] Ogliore R. C. et al. (2012) Astrophys. J. Lett., 745, L19.
[10] Tenner T. J. et al. (2019) GCA, 260, 133-160.