Japan Geoscience Union Meeting 2021

Presentation information

[J] Poster

M (Multidisciplinary and Interdisciplinary) » M-ZZ Others

[M-ZZ47] Renewable energy and earth science

Fri. Jun 4, 2021 5:15 PM - 6:30 PM Ch.20

convener:Hideaki Ohtake(National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology), Daisuke Nohara(Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry), Teruhisa Shimada(Graduate School of Science and Technology, Hirosaki University), Fumichika Uno(Nihon University, College of Humanities and Sciences)

5:15 PM - 6:30 PM

[MZZ47-P02] Redox potential of Fe(II) and Fe(III) concentrations in natural acidic river water

*Seiichiro Ioka1, Yota Suzuki2, Sachi Wakasa1, Hirofumi Muraoka1 (1.Institute of Regional Innovation, Hirosaki University, 2.Fukushima Renewable Energy Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology)

Keywords:Redox potential, Fe(II) and Fe(III) concentrations, natural acidic river water

Various elements (e.g., Al, As, Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu, and Ni) are dissolved in acidic river water. However, when Fe is dissolved in acidic river water, it precipitates and Fe(OH)3 or ferrihydrite is formed. Moreover, some metals are sorbed and natural attenuation occurs in acidic river water. Thus, it is important to evaluate the saturation index. The saturation index is used for the determination of the supersaturated, saturated, and unsaturated conditions, under which the minerals of Fe(OH)3 or ferrihydrite are formed. To calculate the saturation index, either the dissolved Fe(II) and Fe(III) concentrations, or the dissolved Fe concentration and Eh value, must be known. Although the electrochemical measurement of oxidation-reduction potential for the determination of the Eh value has provided unreliable results, some studies have reported the usefulness of the electrode oxidation-reduction potential measurement for the determination of Eh values for conditions under a pH of 4 or less and a total dissolved Fe greater than 10–5.5 molality. However, the pH of acidic river water varies with location. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of measuring the oxidation-reduction potential for the determination of Eh value in acidic river water with pH ranging from 3 to 5.5.
The results indicated that the Eh value calculated on the basis of the concentrations of Fe(II)/Fe(III) agrees with the Eh value calculated from the electrochemical measurements. Thus, the oxidation-reduction potential values electrochemically measured under conditions of pH 5.5 and Fe greater than 10–5.5 molality are useful for the determination of the Eh value. The study suggests that dissolved Fe concentration and Eh value determined by the measurement of oxidation-reduction potential may be important as environmental impact assessment indicators for acidic river water found in geothermal development areas.