日本地球惑星科学連合2021年大会

講演情報

[E] 口頭発表

セッション記号 P (宇宙惑星科学) » P-EM 太陽地球系科学・宇宙電磁気学・宇宙環境

[P-EM11] Coupling Processes in the Atmosphere-Ionosphere System

2021年6月3日(木) 10:45 〜 12:15 Ch.05 (Zoom会場05)

コンビーナ:Liu Huixin(九州大学理学研究院地球惑星科学専攻 九州大学宙空環境研究センター)、Chang Loren(Institute of Space Science, National Central University)、大塚 雄一(名古屋大学宇宙地球環境研究所)、Yue Deng(University of Texas at Arlington)、座長:大塚 雄一(名古屋大学宇宙地球環境研究所)、新堀 淳樹(名古屋大学宇宙地球環境研究所)

11:00 〜 11:15

[PEM11-08] Regional ionospheric parameter estimation by assimilating the LSTM trained results into the SAMI2 model

★Invited Papers

Jeong-Heon Kim1、*Young-Sil Kwak1,2、Yong Ha Kim3、Se Heon Jeong3、Jong Yeon Yun4 (1.Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute、2.University of Science and Technology、3.Chungnam National University、4.Korea Space Weather Center)

キーワード:Ionosphere, forecast model, SAMI2 model, LSTM algorithm, assimilation technique

This talk presents the potential of predicting the regional ionosphere at mid-latitude by assimilating the predicted ionospheric parameters from a neural network (NN) model into the Sami2 is Another Model of the Ionosphere (SAMI2). The NN model was constructed from the dataset of Jeju ionosonde (33.43N, 126.30E) for the period of 1 Jan 2011 to 31 Dec 2015 by using the long-short term memory (LSTM) algorithm. The NN model provides 24-hour prediction of the peak density (NmF2) and peak height (hmF2) of the F2 layer over Jeju. The predicted NmF2 and hmF2 were used to compute two ionospheric drivers (total ion density and effective neutral meridional wind), which were assimilated into the SAMI2 model. The SAMI2-LSTM model estimates the ionospheric conditions over the mid-latitude region around Jeju on the same geomagnetic meridional plane. We evaluate the performance of the SAMI2-LSTM by comparing predicted NmF2 and hmF2 values with measured values during the geomagnetic quiet and storm periods. The root mean square error values of NmF2 (hmF2) from Jeju ionosonde measurements are lower by 45% and 45% (30% and 11%) than those of the SAMI2 and IRI-2016 models during the geomagnetic quiet periods. However, during the geomagnetic storm periods, the performance of the SAMI2-LSTM model does not predict positive geomagnetic storms well. Comparing the quiet and storm periods for the SAMI2-LSTM model, the RMSE of the storm period was calculated to be 2.76 (3.2) times higher at Jeju (Icheon) than in the quiet period. From these results, we demonstrated that in this study, the combination of the NN-LSTM model and physics-based model could improve the ionosphere prediction of existing theoretical and empirical models for mid-latitude regions, at least in geomagnetically quiet conditions. We strongly suggest that this attempt, which has not been reported before, could be used as one of the keys to advance the physics-based model further.