日本地球惑星科学連合2021年大会

講演情報

[E] 口頭発表

セッション記号 P (宇宙惑星科学) » P-EM 太陽地球系科学・宇宙電磁気学・宇宙環境

[P-EM11] Coupling Processes in the Atmosphere-Ionosphere System

2021年6月3日(木) 15:30 〜 17:00 Ch.05 (Zoom会場05)

コンビーナ:Liu Huixin(九州大学理学研究院地球惑星科学専攻 九州大学宙空環境研究センター)、Chang Loren(Institute of Space Science, National Central University)、大塚 雄一(名古屋大学宇宙地球環境研究所)、Yue Deng(University of Texas at Arlington)、座長:Loren Chang(Institute of Space Science, National Central University)、穂積 裕太(電気通信大学)

16:45 〜 17:00

[PEM11-24] Turbulent signatures in the Auroral Cusp Ionosphere based on sounding rocket observations

*Francesca Di Mare1、Andres Spicher2、Lasse Boy Novock Clausen1、Wojciech Jacek Miloch1、Joran Idar Moen3 (1.Dep. of Physics, University of Oslo, Norway、2.Dep. of Physics and Technology, University of Tromso, Norway、3.University Centre in Svalbard, Longyearbyen, Norway)

キーワード:Sounding rocket observations, Turbulence, Ionospheric Irregularities

Space plasmas display fluctuations and nonlinear behavior at a broad range of scales, being in most cases in a turbulent state. The majority of these plasmas are also considered to be heated, with dissipation of turbulence as a possible explanation. Despite of many studies and advances in research, many aspects of the turbulence, heating and their interaction with several space plasma phenomena (e.g., shocks, reconnection, instabilities, waves), remain to be fully understood and many questions are still open. Plasma irregularities and turbulence are believed common in the F-region ionosphere and because of their impact on the GNSS and the human activity [1, 2, 3] in the polar regions, a detailed understanding is required. This study provides a characterization of the turbulence developed inside the polar-cusp ionosphere, including features as intermittency, not extensively addressed so far.
The electron density of ICI-2 and ICI-3 missions have been analyzed using advanced time-series analysis techniques and a standard diagnostics for intermittent turbulence. The following parameters have been obtained: the autocorrelation function, that gives useful information about the correlation scale of the field [4]; the energy power spectra, which show the average spectral indexes ∼−1.7, not far from the Kolmogorov value observed at MHD scales [5], while a steeper power law is suggested below kinetic scales [6]. In addition, the PDFs of the scale-dependent increments display a typical deviation from Gaussian that increase towards small scales due to intense field fluctuations, indication of the presence of intermittency and coherent structures [7, 8, 9]. Finally, the kurtosis-scaling exponent [10, 11] reveals an efficient intermittency, usually related to the occurrence of structures.

References
[1] V. Bothmer, and I. A. Daglis, “Space Weather: Physics and Effects”, 2007, Springer, New York.
[2] H. C. Carlson, 2012, “Sharpening our thinking about polar cap ionospheric patch morphology, research, and mitigation techniques”, Radio Sci., 47, RS0L21.
[3] J. I. Moen, H. C. Carlson, S. E. Milan, N. Shumilov, B. Lybekk, P.E. Sandholt,, and M. Lester, “Space weather challenges of the polar cap ionosphere”, J. Space Weather Space Clim., 2000, 3(A02), 13.
[4] S. Pope, Turbulent Flows, Cambridge University Press, 2000, Cambridge.
[5] R. J. Leamon, C. W. Smith, N. F. Ness, W. H. Matthaeus, “Observational constraints on the dynamics of the interplanetary magnetic field dissipation range”, J. of Geophys. Res., 1998, 103(A3), 4775-4787.
[6] A. Spicher, W. J. Miloch, and J. I. Moen, “Direct evidence of double-slope power spectra in the highlatitude ionospheric plasma”, Geophys. Res. Lett., 2014, 41, 1406–1412.
[7] U. Frisch, “Turbulence. The Legacy of A. N. Kolmogorov”, Cambridge University Press, 1995, Cambridge.
[8] K. R. Sreenivasan, “Fluid Turbulence”, Rev. Mod. Phys., 1999, Vol. 71, 2.
[9] R. Bruno, and V. Carbone, “The Solar Wind as a Turbulence Laboratory”, Living Rev. Sol. Phys., 2005, 10, 2.
[10] F. Anselmet, Y. Gagne, E. J. Hopfinger, and R. A. Antonia,“High order velocity structure functions in turbulent shear flows”, J. Fluid Mech., 1984, 140, 25, 63-89.
[11] K. R. Sreenivasan, and R. Antonia, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 1997, 29, 435-472.