Japan Geoscience Union Meeting 2021

Presentation information

[E] Oral

S (Solid Earth Sciences ) » S-CG Complex & General

[S-CG39] Science of slow earthquakes: Toward unified understandings of whole earthquake process

Sat. Jun 5, 2021 1:45 PM - 3:15 PM Ch.21 (Zoom Room 21)

convener:Satoshi Ide(Department of Earth an Planetary Science, University of Tokyo), Hitoshi Hirose(Research Center for Urban Safety and Security, Kobe University), Kohtaro Ujiie(Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba), Takahiro Hatano(Department of Earth and Space Science, Osaka University), Chairperson:Takahiro Hatano(Department of Earth and Space Science, Osaka University)

1:45 PM - 2:00 PM

[SCG39-07] Systematic understanding of the slip-front-propagation velocity in terms of Linear Marginal Stability Hypothesis

*Takehito Suzuki1 (1.Department of Physics and Mathematics, Aoyama Gakuin University)

Keywords:slip-front-propagation velocity, friction law, Linear Marginal Stability Hypothesis

Slip-front-propagation on an interface between two media has attracted interests of many researchers in scientific and industrial fields. In particular, the slip-front-propagation velocity has been obtained using some friction laws such as the slip-velocity-dependent law. Notably, to obtain the propagation velocity, Linear Marginal Stability Hypothesis (LMSH) has been widely employed. First, LMSH assumes the plane wave solution for the slip profile near the slip front, i.e., u~exp(i (k x-omega t)), where u is the slip and k and omega are the complex wave number and frequency, respectively. The imaginary parts of k and omega are written as ki and omegai, respectively, and the slip-front-propagation velocity is given by v=omegai/ki. We consider the friction law depending on both the slip and slip velocity, leading to two model parameters in the governing equation. We therefore assume that the terms C1 u and C2 \dot{u}, where C1 and C2 are the constants, emerge in the governing equation for u. We have obtained the cubic equation for omegai using LMSH, and found that the numbers of the solutions for omegai can be categorized into 12 regions on the C1-C2 phase space. Here, we aim to categorize the slip-front-propagation velocity on the C1-C2 phase space, and give some implications associated with slow earthquakes.

We should emphasize that the slip front has two forms: the intruding and extruding fronts (see details in Suzuki and Matsukawa, 2019). Actually, we have obtained the analytical solutions for omegai, and they are called omegain1, omegain2, and omegain3 for the intruding front, and omegaex1, omegaex2, and omegaex3 for the extruding front. Using these values and the relationship between ki and omegai, we have also obtained the analytical forms of ki, which are called kin1, kin2, and kin3 for the intruding front, and kex1, kex2, and kex3 for the extruding front. Therefore, we can write analytical forms for the intruding and extruding slip-front-propagation velocities, vinj=omegainj/kinj and vexj=omegaexj/kexj (j=1,2,3), respectively.

In terms of the solutions of vinj and vexj, the C1-C2 phase space is divided into 7 regions. They are the regions with (A) vin1, (B) vex1, (C) vin1 and vex2, (D) vex1 and vex3, (E) vin1, vex2, and vin3, (F) vin1, vex2, and vex3, and (G) no propagation velocity. In particular, we emphasize that there exists the region where vinj or vexj does not exist. This region cannot generate the steady slip-front-propagation, and may imply the generation of slow earthquakes from seismological viewpoint.