日本地球惑星科学連合2021年大会

講演情報

[J] ポスター発表

セッション記号 S (固体地球科学) » S-SS 地震学

[S-SS08] 地震発生の物理・断層のレオロジー

2021年6月4日(金) 17:15 〜 18:30 Ch.14

コンビーナ:金木 俊也(京都大学防災研究所)、大谷 真紀子(東京大学地震研究所)、岡崎 啓史(海洋研究開発機構)、吉田 圭佑(東北大学理学研究科附属地震噴火予知研究観測センター)

17:15 〜 18:30

[SSS08-P20] 熱クラックが含水岩石の弾性波速度と電気伝導度に与える影響

*一松 駿斗1、渡辺 了2、高橋 美紀3 (1.富山大学理学部地球科学科、2.富山大学学術研究部都市デザイン学系、3.独立行政法人産業技術総合研究所活断層・火山研究部門)

キーワード:電気伝導度、地震波速度、流体、クラック、地殻、花崗岩

Cracks have strong influence on elastic wave velocity and electrical conductivity in fluid-bearing rocks. As the pressure is increased, cracks are closed to reduce their influence. Some parts of a crack, however, can remain open to affect physical properties under high pressure. Does the increase in the number of crack lead to the increase in the quantity of pores that can remain open under high pressure? In order to answer this question, we have conducted simultaneous measurements of elastic wave velocity and electrical conductivity on brine-saturated thermally-cracked granitic rocks.

A fine grained (500-1500 μm) granite (Oshima, Ehime Pref., Japan) was used as a rock sample and made into the cylindrical shape (D=26 mm, L=30 mm). Some cylindrical samples were heated up to 650 ℃ and quenched to create thermal cracks. Heating to 650 ℃ reduced compressional wave velocity by at most ~70 %. Samples were filled with 0.1M KCl aqueous solution and loaded in a pressure vessel to measure ultrasonic velocity (f=2 MHz) and electrical conductivity. The electrical conductivity of the pore-fluid is high enough (~1 S/m) to suppress the contribution of surface conduction. The pore-fluid was electrically insulated from the metal work by using plastic devices. The confining pressure was kept at 0.1 MPa. It took 3 days or longer for the electrical conductivity to become stationary after increasing the confining pressure.

At the atmospheric pressure, the heated sample showed remarkably lower velocities and higher conductivity than the unheated sample. The compressional and shear wave velocities in the heated sample were lower than those in the unheated sample by 19% and 40%, respectively. The electrical conductivity in the heated sample was one order of magnitude higher than that in the unheated sample. As the confining pressure was increased, velocity increased and conductivity decreased both in heated and unheated samples. Large velocity increase was observed in the unheated sample at pressure lower than 50 MPa. These changes must be caused by the closure of cracks under pressures. The velocity difference between heated and unheated sample was greatly reduced with the confining pressure at the confining pressure of 150 MPa. On the other hand, the conductivity in the heated sample was still higher than that in the unheated sample by more than one order of magnitude. This suggests that the heat treatment increases the amount of pores which can maintain open at high pressure.