Japan Geoscience Union Meeting 2023

Presentation information

[J] Oral

S (Solid Earth Sciences ) » S-CG Complex & General

[S-CG52] Ocean Floor Geoscience

Tue. May 23, 2023 9:00 AM - 10:15 AM 301A (International Conference Hall, Makuhari Messe)

convener:Kyoko Okino(Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, The University of Tokyo), Keiichi Tadokoro(Research Center for Seismology, Volcanology and Earthquake and Volcano Research Center, Nagoya University), Chairperson:Hiroshi Sato(School of Business Administration, Senshu University), Masakazu Fujii(National Institute of Polar Research and SOKENDAI)

9:15 AM - 9:30 AM

[SCG52-07] Magnetic anomalies and magnetization intensity around the Rodriguez Triple Junction, Indian Ocean

*Mai Kikui1, Masao Nakanishi2 (1.Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Chiba University, 2.Graduate School of Science, Chiba University)

The three plates, the African, Indian-Australian, and Antarctic plates, meet at the Rodriguez Triple Junction (RTJ) near 25°30'S and 70°E in the southern Indian Ocean. The plate boundaries of the triple junction are the Central Indian, Southeast Indian, and Southwest Indian ridges. Several hydrothermal fields (e.g.: Kairi and Edmond hydrothermal fields) have been found along the Central Indian Ridge (e.g., Gamo et al. 2001; Van Dover et al. 2001).
Several studies (e.g., Honsho et al., 1996; Mendel et al., 2000; Okino et al., 2015) studied the tectonic history of the RTJ based on bathymetric and magnetic data. However, they didn't sufficiently treat the temporal and spatial variation in the magnetization intensity of the oceanic crust.
We presented temporal variation in magnetization intensity of the oceanic crust around the RTJ and the magnetization intensity around hydrothermal fields in the last JpGU meeting (Kikui and Nakanishi, 2022). After the meeting, we identified the magnetic anomaly lineations and the traces of the non-transform offset to make the more precise age data of the crust. In this presentation, we will mainly report the more detailed temporal and spatial variation in magnetization intensity.
We complied multibeam bathymetric and magnetic data obtained by Japanese, Germany, French and American vessels. We calculated magnetic anomalies using the Comprehensive Model 4 (CM4, Sabaka et al., 2004) and International Geomagnetic Reference Field (Alken et al., 2021). We minimized crossover errors of magnetic anomaly data adopted by the levelling method proposed by Ishihara (2015). We carried out the three-dimensional inversion of magnetic anomaly data using Fourier transform method by Macdonald et al. (1980) to obtain magnetization intensity.