日本地球惑星科学連合2024年大会

講演情報

[J] 口頭発表

セッション記号 P (宇宙惑星科学) » P-EM 太陽地球系科学・宇宙電磁気学・宇宙環境

[P-EM17] 宇宙プラズマ科学

2024年5月31日(金) 09:00 〜 10:30 102 (幕張メッセ国際会議場)

コンビーナ:天野 孝伸(東京大学 地球惑星科学専攻)、三宅 洋平(神戸大学大学院システム情報学研究科)、諌山 翔伍(九州大学総合理工学研究院)、梅田 隆行(北海道大学 情報基盤センター)、座長:諌山 翔伍(九州大学総合理工学研究院)、簑島 敬(海洋研究開発機構 数理科学・先端技術研究開発センター)

10:15 〜 10:30

[PEM17-16] 電場観測における光電子と衛星帯電による影響の除去について

*中川 朋子1堀 智昭2笠羽 康正3小路 真史2三好 由純2松田 昇也4笠原 禎也4篠原 育5 (1.東北工業大学工学部情報通信工学科、2.名古屋大学宇宙地球環境研究所、3.東北大学 惑星プラズマ・大気研究センター、4.金沢大学、5.宇宙航空研究開発機構/宇宙科学研究所)

キーワード:電場、光電子、衛星帯電、ダブルプローブ法、あらせ

In general, space borne measurement of the magnetospheric electric field employing the double probe technique suffers from a spurious pseudo-sunward electric field component induced by spacecraft charging and photoelectrons. The Electric Field Detector (EFD) of the Plasma Wave Experiment (PWE) instrument onboard the Arase [TH1] satellite observed a distorted waveform of spin modulation in the electric potential difference between the probes and the spacecraft. The distorted waveform suggests that the spurious electric field can be represented by a combined electric potential applied by two model charges each representing the photoelectron cloud and spacecraft charging. An attempt was made to separate the spurious electric field component from the observed field to deduce the natural magnetospheric electric field by fitting some parameters of the two charges to the observed waveforms. The resultant fitted parameters successfully reproduced the observed distortion in the waveforms of the potential difference. However, in some cases, the fitting procedure overestimated the spurious component, resulting in an over-subtraction of the sunward component and thereby an erroneous electric field. That is[TH2] because the spurious electric field component has a sinusoidal component with the spacecraft spin period. To prevent the over-subtraction, a higher harmonic component was then employed to estimate the model charges. The new method works in a model calculation, but does not work well for Arase observations, due to inaccuracy of the positions of the model charges, and the spin modulation in the sunlit area of the spacecraft, from which photoelectrons are emitted.