日本地球惑星科学連合2025年大会

講演情報

[E] 口頭発表

セッション記号 H (地球人間圏科学) » H-DS 防災地球科学

[H-DS07] 地すべりおよび関連現象

2025年5月30日(金) 13:45 〜 15:15 102 (幕張メッセ国際会議場)

コンビーナ:王 功輝(京都大学防災研究所)、齋藤 仁(名古屋大学 大学院環境学研究科)、千木良 雅弘(公益財団法人 深田地質研究所)、今泉 文寿(静岡大学農学部)、座長:土井 一生(京都大学防災研究所)、李 長澤(京都大学)

14:15 〜 14:30

[HDS07-15] Comparison of YOLO and BASEGRAIN approaches for analysing sediments in debris flow channel deposits

*Samikshya Dahal1Fumitoshi Imaizumi2Shoki Takayama3、Tomoya Osada2 (1.Gifu University、2.Shizuoka University、3.Kyoto University)


キーワード:Debris flow, Grain size, UAV photogrammetry, Machine learning, BASEGRAIN

Debris flow is a mixture of sediments and water that travels down steep slopes at high speeds, causing significant destruction. It transports sediments that range in size from millimetre-scale clay to meter-sized boulders, which are deposited in channels with their proportion varying spatially. Since the sediments in a channel influence future debris flows, research to find a solution for obtaining precise grain size distribution information is important. To achieve this, we assessed the effectiveness of two approaches in sediment analysis of debris flow channel deposits: Automatic object detection software BASEGRAIN and a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based model YOLOv8. We utilised orthomosaics and digital elevation models (DEMs) created through unmanned aerial vehicle structure-from-motion (UAV-SFM) photogrammetry to analyse the grain size and catchment topography of the debris flow channel. Results from BASEGRAIN and YOLOv8 were validated against field grid sampling results. BASEGRAIN software, which specialised in grain size analysis of fluvial gravel beds, was efficient in analysing boulders; however, it showed limitations in detecting sediments of debris flow deposits that vary significantly in shape, size, and geological composition. Debris flow sediments often have irregular shapes and include debris like dead leaves and wood, which limited BASEGRAIN’s automatic analysis. Manual removal of vegetation and wood was necessary for effective analysis. In contrast, YOLOv8 showed advantages in identifying angular sediments, classifying geological materials such as sandstone and shale, and detecting vegetation and wood, as these variations were used to train the model. The results indicated that the automatic object detection approach used by BASEGRAIN allows for the initiation of the sediment detection process without requiring model training. However, when addressing debris flow sediments with irregular shapes and varying sizes and materials, YOLOv8 demonstrated better sediment detection capabilities. These findings have significant implications for understanding the spatio-temporal variations in sediments within debris flow channels, also facilitating their integration into debris flow modelling.