日本地球惑星科学連合2021年大会

講演情報

[E] 口頭発表

セッション記号 S (固体地球科学) » S-CG 固体地球科学複合領域・一般

[S-CG39] Science of slow earthquakes: Toward unified understandings of whole earthquake process

2021年6月5日(土) 13:45 〜 15:15 Ch.21 (Zoom会場21)

コンビーナ:井出 哲(東京大学大学院理学系研究科地球惑星科学専攻)、廣瀬 仁(神戸大学都市安全研究センター)、氏家 恒太郎(筑波大学生命環境系)、波多野 恭弘(大阪大学理学研究科)、座長:波多野 恭弘(大阪大学理学研究科)

14:00 〜 14:15

[SCG39-08] Effects of periodic stress perturbations on earthquake nucleation

*齋藤 拓也1、波多野 恭弘2 (1.青山学院大学、2.大阪大学)

キーワード:スロー地震、非平衡統計物理、核形成、応力摂動

One of the crucial methods to discover underlying physics is to investigate a mechanical response. This idea is inherent not only in laboratory scale, but applicable to a kilometer-scale fault [1]. Recent studies have been showing a high susceptibility of tremors in slow earthquake [2], which may be sorted into an issue of the mechanical response. This study numerically investigates effects on earthquake nucleation growths of periodic stress perturbations like ocean tides. By assuming the rate- and state-dependent friction law on a flat fault embedded in an elastic continuum, we compute the earthquake occurrence rate as a function of the stress or the phase of stress perturbation.

The remarkable points in the results are as follows:
(1) The phase distributions do not show a large phase shift.
(2) The earthquake occurrence is defined as the moment when the slip velocity exceeds a given threshold value. The occurrence rate is one-to-one mapped onto the shear or the normal stress at the moment of occurrence. This implies an instantaneous response.
(3) The dependences of occurrence rate on the shear or the normal stress appear to be exponential. This indicates existence of a characteristic stress.
(4) Variation of the normal stress additionally alters a frictional state on the interface according to the rock experiments performed by Linker and Dieterich [3], but this Linker-Dietrich effect on the stress response has not been well understood yet. As a result of numerical simulation, the Linker-Dieterich effect is found to suppress a difference in value of the phase distributions. Eventually, if the effect is very large, we observe even antiphase distribution (see fig. 1).

[1] T. J. Ader, N. Lapusta, J.-P. Avouac, and J.-P. Ampuero, Geophys. J. Int. 198, 385 (2014).
[2] S. Ide and Y. Tanaka, Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 3842 (2014); S. Ide, S. Yabe, H.-J. Tai, and K. H. Chen,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 3248 (2015).
[3] M. F. Linker, J. H. Dieterich, J. Geophys. Res. 97 4923 (1992).