The 10th Asian Crop Science Association Conference

講演情報

Poster Session

Crop Genetics and Physiology » P4: Poster Session

[P4] Crop Genetics and Physiology

2021年9月9日(木) 12:15 〜 14:00 Room 4 (Poster) (Crop Genetics and Physiology)

13:15 〜 14:00

[P4-42] CRISPR/Cas9 ー Based Genome Editing of GCN5, a Histone Acetyltransferase Gene, in Rice (Oryza sativa L.)

*Nominated for Presentation Awards

Shu Takakura1, Fumiya Miyamoto1, Shicheng Feng1, Sakae Agarie2, Kazuyuki Saitou2 (1.Graduate School of Bioresource and Bioenviroment Sciences, Kyushu University, Japan, 2.Faculty of Agriculture (Graduate School), Kyushu University, Japan)

Nitrogen is a primary component of plant substances. The expression of Rubisco genes is enhanced in response to nitrogen supply. Histone acetylation regulates gene expression in diverse biological processes, but histone acetylation events regulating the expression of Rubisco genes are not well understood. In this study, to examine whether the rice histone acetyltransferase GENERAL CONTROL NON-REPRESSED PROTEINS (GCN5) regulates the expression of Rubisco genes, we produced GCN5 knockout rices using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. We choosed two guide RNA spacer sequences corresponding to nucleotides 65-83 and 203-221 of the GCN5 coding region. The two sequences were inserted into CRISPR/Cas9 expression vector pRGEB32 and designed as KO1-GCN5 plasmid and KO2-GCN5 plasmid, respectively. The plasmids were introduced into rice calluses through Agrobacterium tumefaciens (strain EHA105). Fourteen (6.4%) of 218 calluses infected with the Agrobacterium harbored the KO1-GCN5 plasmid redifferentiated. Eight (57%) of the 14 redifferentiated individuals had mutations in the GCN5 gene. The mutations included deletions of one to 159 bases and insertions of one or two bases. Five individuals (62.5%) of the eight mutants had frameshift mutations in one GCN5 allele, and one individual (12.5%) had frameshift mutations in both GCN5 alleles. The same results were obtained in calluses introduced the KO2-GCN5 plasmid. There was no obvious phenotypic difference between the heterozygous knockout rice and the wild-type rice. Tiller number of the homozygous knockout rice was fewer than that of the wild-type rice. The homozygous knockout rice was smaller than the wild-type rice, suggesting that GCN5 regulates the growth of rice.